ACMOC
Login
ACMOC
Hotroding a d6d

Hotroding a d6d

Showing 1 to 10 of 54 results
1
Magard
Topic Author
Offline
Send a private message to Magard
Posts: 147
Thank you received: 0
I have a d6d that I contract for fire dozer work. I just found the fuel rack screw. This tractor will now put the new stuff to shame. I feel way better being able to have power to pull second gear up any hill now. Just wondering if the ass end will be able to take it. 10 liter engine with fuel going to it is pretty impressive.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Fri, Aug 31, 2018 9:05 AM
Rome K/G
Offline
Send a private message to Rome K/G
Posts: 6,092
Thank you received: 0
Well if its blowing black smoke out like a steam locomotive then start saving your dimes for an overhaul soon! Over fueling results in cracked pistons, broken rings, over heating, cracked heads, worn sleeves and shorter turbo life. Good luck!
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Fri, Aug 31, 2018 9:50 AM
Magard
Topic Author
Offline
Send a private message to Magard
Posts: 147
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Rome K/G:
Well if its blowing black smoke out like a steam locomotive then start saving your dimes for an overhaul soon! Over fueling results in cracked pistons, broken rings, over heating, cracked heads, worn sleeves and shorter turbo life. Good luck!
No big smoke. Fuel costs to much for that.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Fri, Aug 31, 2018 10:15 AM
Paso Bob
Offline
Send a private message to Paso Bob
Posts: 711
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Magard:
No big smoke. Fuel costs to much for that.
Just curious why you would push your tractor so hard and risk wearing the engine out quickly when you are paid by the day on fire work. Cat set the engine RPM's for a reason and keeping it stock will keep you in the money for a lot longer without premature overhaul costs.
D-4 7U-43159 with 4S dozer and Cat 40 scraper, D-7 3T-1179 with Cat 7S hydraulic dozer, D-7 17A 13,944, D-8 14A-1160 with Cat 8S cable dozer, Cat 12-99E-4433 Grader. All runners and users.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Fri, Aug 31, 2018 10:38 AM
Magard
Topic Author
Offline
Send a private message to Magard
Posts: 147
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Paso Bob:
Just curious why you would push your tractor so hard and risk wearing the engine out quickly when you are paid by the day on fire work. Cat set the engine RPM's for a reason and keeping it stock will keep you in the money for a lot longer without premature overhaul costs.
I understand getting paid by the day and more fuel burn doesn’t make me more money. My tractor still had the wires on the governor housing. Could barely spin the tracks in first gear. Backing up a steep hill made you wonder if your gona get out of there. I’m wanting to have extra power when I want it. Doesn’t mean you have to use it all the time. Fighting fire in a underpowered tractor sucks. Fighting fire in a underpowered tractor that is out dated buy modern technology makes you look inept. Old iron is faithful though and I like that. I’m not pushing hp beyond what the engine can do. I’m more interested in the ass end of the tractor. I know the c series was weak. I believe the d series is way stronger.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Fri, Aug 31, 2018 11:15 AM
Wombat
Offline
Member
Donor
Send a private message to Wombat
Posts: 1,006
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Magard:
I understand getting paid by the day and more fuel burn doesn’t make me more money. My tractor still had the wires on the governor housing. Could barely spin the tracks in first gear. Backing up a steep hill made you wonder if your gona get out of there. I’m wanting to have extra power when I want it. Doesn’t mean you have to use it all the time. Fighting fire in a underpowered tractor sucks. Fighting fire in a underpowered tractor that is out dated buy modern technology makes you look inept. Old iron is faithful though and I like that. I’m not pushing hp beyond what the engine can do. I’m more interested in the ass end of the tractor. I know the c series was weak. I believe the d series is way stronger.
I learnt the hard way as a young tractor owner and operator, fiddled with fuel settings and revs etc, all it did was cost me money. The engineers work to build a tractor to match from the front to the back, you change one of their settings you are inviting trouble. I am not sure if they called them D6D or D6E tractors, looked the same with 7 roller track frames and 160hp, they had heavier final drives, so maybe that tells you something, leave it standard. If that model tractor won't perform and do what you want, go get a model designed to perform how you want it to perform.

As Deas would say, 'just my 2 cents worth', Wombat
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Fri, Aug 31, 2018 12:11 PM
Deas Plant.
Offline
Member
Send a private message to Deas Plant.
Location: Currently - DowNunda.
Posts: 6,640
Thank you received: 11
Reply to Wombat:
I learnt the hard way as a young tractor owner and operator, fiddled with fuel settings and revs etc, all it did was cost me money. The engineers work to build a tractor to match from the front to the back, you change one of their settings you are inviting trouble. I am not sure if they called them D6D or D6E tractors, looked the same with 7 roller track frames and 160hp, they had heavier final drives, so maybe that tells you something, leave it standard. If that model tractor won't perform and do what you want, go get a model designed to perform how you want it to perform.

As Deas would say, 'just my 2 cents worth', Wombat
Hi, Magard.
While I understand your desire for more 'grunt' and better performance, there IS a reason why Cat has the reputation for reliability that it does. From what I have seen, Cat has always specc-ed their tractors with the horsepower a little under those of their competition a little under those of their competition. This was not, I suspect, by Cat's design but more because the competition wanted to out perform the Cat machines and so gave them a little more power without understanding that more power creates more stress in the machine and requires better engineering to cope with it.

Yes, Cat has had machines that had problems in the past and may well do so again but, by and large, they have put VERY few failures into the market place. This is largely due to over-engineering of most components and a rigorous testing program for every new model.

I would suggest that if you can pull second gear up ANY hill now, you just might could be possibly may be 'straining the bonds of friendship' with both your engine and your drive train.

Back in 1971, when I first saw the specs for the newly introduced Allis Chalmers HD41, I thought to myself, there are some major repair bills just waiting to happen here. The HD41 was 540 hp, 155 hp more than the then current D9G and the HD41 weighed a WHOLE TEN tons more with similar attachments, not much more than the weight of a D4D with dozer and rear ripper at 65 hp. My thinking was that there was not enough metal and weight in the rest of the machine to cope with that extra power.

Then I heard that a major DowNunda contractor had bought 2 of them and put them to work ripping hard sandstone - - - and had had to repair track frames and final drives - - - and de-rate both machines just to keep them working a little longer between breakdowns.

Does this give you a clue?

BUTTTTT, it'z not MY tractor.

Just my 0.02.

You have a wonderful day. Best wishes. Deas Plant.

Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Fri, Aug 31, 2018 2:00 PM
neil
Online
Moderator
Admin
Send a private message to neil
Posts: 6,941
Thank you received: 7
Reply to Deas Plant.:
Hi, Magard.
While I understand your desire for more 'grunt' and better performance, there IS a reason why Cat has the reputation for reliability that it does. From what I have seen, Cat has always specc-ed their tractors with the horsepower a little under those of their competition a little under those of their competition. This was not, I suspect, by Cat's design but more because the competition wanted to out perform the Cat machines and so gave them a little more power without understanding that more power creates more stress in the machine and requires better engineering to cope with it.

Yes, Cat has had machines that had problems in the past and may well do so again but, by and large, they have put VERY few failures into the market place. This is largely due to over-engineering of most components and a rigorous testing program for every new model.

I would suggest that if you can pull second gear up ANY hill now, you just might could be possibly may be 'straining the bonds of friendship' with both your engine and your drive train.

Back in 1971, when I first saw the specs for the newly introduced Allis Chalmers HD41, I thought to myself, there are some major repair bills just waiting to happen here. The HD41 was 540 hp, 155 hp more than the then current D9G and the HD41 weighed a WHOLE TEN tons more with similar attachments, not much more than the weight of a D4D with dozer and rear ripper at 65 hp. My thinking was that there was not enough metal and weight in the rest of the machine to cope with that extra power.

Then I heard that a major DowNunda contractor had bought 2 of them and put them to work ripping hard sandstone - - - and had had to repair track frames and final drives - - - and de-rate both machines just to keep them working a little longer between breakdowns.

Does this give you a clue?

BUTTTTT, it'z not MY tractor.

Just my 0.02.
Hi Magard,
I don't think you'll be able to get the answer to your question here because as far as I know no-one on the forum is privy to the detailed testing results from Cat regarding the strength of your tractor's powertrain. I doubt you'd be able to get that info from Cat either but you could try asking them. What you could do though is see if that powertrain, or parts of it, were used in a higher rated machine and if so, what the longevity was like there.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Fri, Aug 31, 2018 7:06 PM
catsilver
Offline
Send a private message to catsilver
Posts: 1,644
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Deas Plant.:
Hi, Magard.
While I understand your desire for more 'grunt' and better performance, there IS a reason why Cat has the reputation for reliability that it does. From what I have seen, Cat has always specc-ed their tractors with the horsepower a little under those of their competition a little under those of their competition. This was not, I suspect, by Cat's design but more because the competition wanted to out perform the Cat machines and so gave them a little more power without understanding that more power creates more stress in the machine and requires better engineering to cope with it.

Yes, Cat has had machines that had problems in the past and may well do so again but, by and large, they have put VERY few failures into the market place. This is largely due to over-engineering of most components and a rigorous testing program for every new model.

I would suggest that if you can pull second gear up ANY hill now, you just might could be possibly may be 'straining the bonds of friendship' with both your engine and your drive train.

Back in 1971, when I first saw the specs for the newly introduced Allis Chalmers HD41, I thought to myself, there are some major repair bills just waiting to happen here. The HD41 was 540 hp, 155 hp more than the then current D9G and the HD41 weighed a WHOLE TEN tons more with similar attachments, not much more than the weight of a D4D with dozer and rear ripper at 65 hp. My thinking was that there was not enough metal and weight in the rest of the machine to cope with that extra power.

Then I heard that a major DowNunda contractor had bought 2 of them and put them to work ripping hard sandstone - - - and had had to repair track frames and final drives - - - and de-rate both machines just to keep them working a little longer between breakdowns.

Does this give you a clue?

BUTTTTT, it'z not MY tractor.

Just my 0.02.
The quickest way to seize a piston and you can't run from a fire with a rod poking through the side of the engine, if you must give it more, no more than a quarter turn on the screw, you don't get any work done with the tracks spinning.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Fri, Aug 31, 2018 7:09 PM
ronm
Offline
Send a private message to ronm
Posts: 1,143
Thank you received: 0
Reply to catsilver:
The quickest way to seize a piston and you can't run from a fire with a rod poking through the side of the engine, if you must give it more, no more than a quarter turn on the screw, you don't get any work done with the tracks spinning.
My cousins used to work fires with Cats, & from some of the stories they told, I can see where you would want the ability to get the Hell out of a tight spot if the need arises-and the need CAN arise. My cousin said he smelled grease & paint getting hot once before he got through a spot where the fire jumped the road he was on, no choice but to keep going...that was a TD25C IH, but same difference. Don't let these old women on here scare you, if you need a little more power to do what you need to do...I'm sure you realize it is a trade-off. These guys are so oriented toward making old stuff last forever they can't see any other viewpoint...
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Fri, Aug 31, 2018 8:25 PM
catsilver
Offline
Send a private message to catsilver
Posts: 1,644
Thank you received: 0
Reply to ronm:
My cousins used to work fires with Cats, & from some of the stories they told, I can see where you would want the ability to get the Hell out of a tight spot if the need arises-and the need CAN arise. My cousin said he smelled grease & paint getting hot once before he got through a spot where the fire jumped the road he was on, no choice but to keep going...that was a TD25C IH, but same difference. Don't let these old women on here scare you, if you need a little more power to do what you need to do...I'm sure you realize it is a trade-off. These guys are so oriented toward making old stuff last forever they can't see any other viewpoint...
I've seen the failures too, I've never owned a machine but after being involved with heavy plant and marine engines for 45 years, I know they are designed within limits to give a decent working life at a reasonable cost per hour or work done, you can play around with horsepower etc, but there is a good reason why the AGSA machines can only put out higher horsepower in higher gears and it is to stop torque overload of the final drives etc in the lower gears. We even used to advise against welding on extra deep grousers to pull bigger ploughs in low gears, you would pay for it in final drive repairs.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Fri, Aug 31, 2018 9:05 PM
Showing 1 to 10 of 54 results
1
YouTube Video Placeholder

Follow Us on Social Media

Our channel highlights machines from the earliest Holt and Best track-type tractors, equipment from the start of Caterpillar in 1925, up to units built in the mid-1960s.

Upcoming Events

Veerkamp Open House 2025

Chapter Fifteen

| Placerville, CA

Stradsett Park Vintage Rally

Chapter Two

| Stradsett, Nr Downham Market. Norfolk PE33 9HA UK

Chapter 2 The Link Club's AGM

Chapter Two

| Faulkner Farm, West Drove, Wisbech, Cambridgeshire, PE14 7DP, UK
View Calendar
ACMOC

Antique Caterpillar
Machinery Owners Club

1115 Madison St NE # 1117
Salem, OR 97301

[email protected]

Terms & Privacy
Website developed by AdCo

Testimonials

"I became a member recently because the wealth of knowledge here is priceless." 
-Chris R

Join Today!