ACMOC
Login
ACMOC
1949 D4 Ram Gasket

1949 D4 Ram Gasket

Showing 1 to 10 of 13 results
1
JRMunn
Topic Author
Offline
Send a private message to JRMunn
Posts: 20
Thank you received: 0
I'm new to this forum and am hoping to connect with people who are familiar with the mechanics of an older caterpillar tractor that I am trying to keep running. It is a 1949 D47U electric start with an original Holt dozer blade that is raised and lowered by hydraulic rams (plus limited angle and tilt settings that require manual adjustment). After repairing the rusted out blade and some basic maintenance, the tractor is working except for hydraulic leaks and some battery charging problems. The local Holt dealer has been good about finding replacement parts, but I still have a substantial leak coming from the gasket between the hydraulic cylinder assembly and the plate holding the packing. This leak really needs to be fixed, which I expect will require replacing the gasket. But this gasket it is not even shown on the cylinder group parts diagram that the Holt dealer found among pdf files of pages from old parts manuals. Any advice on how to find and replace this gasket or otherwise fix the leak would be greatly appreciated. Attached (I hope) pictures and diagram may help.

JRMunn
Attachment
Attachment
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Mon, Dec 16, 2013 2:15 PM
Ray54
Offline
Send a private message to Ray54
Posts: 1,858
Thank you received: 5
I have not had work on that ram,but from other experience I think if you remove the cover it has a dust wiper seal in the front and the rear part of the cover pushes on chevron packing rings that do the real sealing.If there is any gape where you think the gasket would be try tightening the bolts holding it,you may be lucky and still have some life in the chevron seals.If not a good hydraulic repair shop should be able to find new one,but they are getting pricey .When putting new chevrons in just put things snug not tight at first ,run it up and down a few times and slowly tighten it until it is not leaking.As you us it and it starts leaking again just tighten a little more.The picture doesn't show it very well so it may be some other design of a seal .But the packing gland that could be tightened was very common in this time frame,and the cover looks like that type to me.
Ray
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Mon, Dec 16, 2013 9:08 PM
Old Magnet
Offline
Send a private message to Old Magnet
Posts: 16,694
Thank you received: 16
Reply to Ray54:
I have not had work on that ram,but from other experience I think if you remove the cover it has a dust wiper seal in the front and the rear part of the cover pushes on chevron packing rings that do the real sealing.If there is any gape where you think the gasket would be try tightening the bolts holding it,you may be lucky and still have some life in the chevron seals.If not a good hydraulic repair shop should be able to find new one,but they are getting pricey .When putting new chevrons in just put things snug not tight at first ,run it up and down a few times and slowly tighten it until it is not leaking.As you us it and it starts leaking again just tighten a little more.The picture doesn't show it very well so it may be some other design of a seal .But the packing gland that could be tightened was very common in this time frame,and the cover looks like that type to me.
Ray
If that is a Cat cylinder there is a brass sealing washer that goes between the cylinder and the head assy. I believe the part number is the 3F9375 as shown but I can't remember for sure other than I know I have purchased them in the past.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Mon, Dec 16, 2013 11:14 PM
JRMunn
Topic Author
Offline
Send a private message to JRMunn
Posts: 20
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Old Magnet:
If that is a Cat cylinder there is a brass sealing washer that goes between the cylinder and the head assy. I believe the part number is the 3F9375 as shown but I can't remember for sure other than I know I have purchased them in the past.
Thanks for the suggestions. I have tightened the bolts holding the ram head to the cylinder assembly without reducing the leak. The parts diagram does not show a gasket of any sort between these major components? However, tightening the packing bolts did stop weeping from the rod seal. The leak I am trying to fix is substantial and occurs when the system is pressurized to push the blade down or up. While cutting and leveling a building pad in hard, rocky ground this fall, I was going through about a gallon of hydraulic fluid in a days use. And to add insult to the expense, the leak spurts oil toward the driver. Taking the entire ram to a hydraulic repair shop is probably a good idea that would head off my working on one problem while creating another on parts that have probably not been serviced for decades. And the rams also need new hoses.

JRMunn
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Tue, Dec 17, 2013 2:37 AM
Old Magnet
Offline
Send a private message to Old Magnet
Posts: 16,694
Thank you received: 16
Reply to JRMunn:
Thanks for the suggestions. I have tightened the bolts holding the ram head to the cylinder assembly without reducing the leak. The parts diagram does not show a gasket of any sort between these major components? However, tightening the packing bolts did stop weeping from the rod seal. The leak I am trying to fix is substantial and occurs when the system is pressurized to push the blade down or up. While cutting and leveling a building pad in hard, rocky ground this fall, I was going through about a gallon of hydraulic fluid in a days use. And to add insult to the expense, the leak spurts oil toward the driver. Taking the entire ram to a hydraulic repair shop is probably a good idea that would head off my working on one problem while creating another on parts that have probably not been serviced for decades. And the rams also need new hoses.

JRMunn
If you don't want to believe me that's ok but there is a brass seating washer between the cylinder and head assy. Could be someone else didn't believe it either and left it out or buggered it up. Same seal was used on the later cylinders. You can see where there is a cross section view. Only question is the part number. Check out the 3F9375 part number and see what you get.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Tue, Dec 17, 2013 4:16 AM
STEPHEN
Offline
Send a private message to STEPHEN
Posts: 2,461
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Old Magnet:
If you don't want to believe me that's ok but there is a brass seating washer between the cylinder and head assy. Could be someone else didn't believe it either and left it out or buggered it up. Same seal was used on the later cylinders. You can see where there is a cross section view. Only question is the part number. Check out the 3F9375 part number and see what you get.


OM, I have never seen an old style cylinder, so is that what we are looking at? and when did they change to the new style like in the page you provided. Just looking at the page, the 3F9375 looks like it would be an o-ring under a two bolt flange that attaches to the head. Was it common for an after market blade system to use a Cat cylinder?
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Tue, Dec 17, 2013 5:01 AM
Old Magnet
Offline
Send a private message to Old Magnet
Posts: 16,694
Thank you received: 16
Reply to STEPHEN:


OM, I have never seen an old style cylinder, so is that what we are looking at? and when did they change to the new style like in the page you provided. Just looking at the page, the 3F9375 looks like it would be an o-ring under a two bolt flange that attaches to the head. Was it common for an after market blade system to use a Cat cylinder?
Here is the old style cylinder.
Cylinder change was is the early 50's, have to go by the part number stamped on the cylinder head.
Yes, some aftermarket set ups used the Cat cylinders and hydraulic system.

3F9375 is the correct number for the brass seal, I still have some in original package. The one set of cylinders I have open does not have provision for o-ring and no gasket is called out for the interface between the tube assy and the cylinder head.

You guys are sure hard to convince.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Tue, Dec 17, 2013 7:26 AM
JRMunn
Topic Author
Offline
Send a private message to JRMunn
Posts: 20
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Old Magnet:
Here is the old style cylinder.
Cylinder change was is the early 50's, have to go by the part number stamped on the cylinder head.
Yes, some aftermarket set ups used the Cat cylinders and hydraulic system.

3F9375 is the correct number for the brass seal, I still have some in original package. The one set of cylinders I have open does not have provision for o-ring and no gasket is called out for the interface between the tube assy and the cylinder head.

You guys are sure hard to convince.
[quote="Old Magnet"]Here is the old style cylinder.
Cylinder change was is the early 50's, have to go by the part number stamped on the cylinder head.
Yes, some aftermarket set ups used the Cat cylinders and hydraulic system.

3F9375 is the correct number for the brass seal, I still have some in original package. The one set of cylinders I have open does not have provision for o-ring and no gasket is called out for the interface between the tube assy and the cylinder head.

You guys are sure hard to convince.[/quote]

I would not question what someone with so much more experience is telling me. My confusion was from not understanding how part number 3F9375 as shown on the parts diagram was related to joining the cylinder and head assemblies. With further prompting, I now see that the bracket spanning both the head assembly and gasket part numbers means that the gasket is for the whole head assembly rather than where the arrow points. Sometimes I don't see the forest from being too focused on the trees, but will get better with practice. I also appreciate seeing the parts diagram for the older style cylinder that shows what I actually have.

In order to change this gasket, I assume that the ram should be removed from the tractor and the rod must be removed from the head assembly, so it would also be a good time to change the packing and any other gaskets that need to be removed. Is there also an internal seal that I should be replacing?

Thanks to everyone for the suggestions. This has been very helpful! Tomorrow I can start trying to remove the rams, which will probably lead to spilling hydraulic fluid (that my wife has found very hard to get out of the work clothes).

JRMunn
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Tue, Dec 17, 2013 8:59 AM
Old Magnet
Offline
Send a private message to Old Magnet
Posts: 16,694
Thank you received: 16
Reply to JRMunn:
[quote="Old Magnet"]Here is the old style cylinder.
Cylinder change was is the early 50's, have to go by the part number stamped on the cylinder head.
Yes, some aftermarket set ups used the Cat cylinders and hydraulic system.

3F9375 is the correct number for the brass seal, I still have some in original package. The one set of cylinders I have open does not have provision for o-ring and no gasket is called out for the interface between the tube assy and the cylinder head.

You guys are sure hard to convince.[/quote]

I would not question what someone with so much more experience is telling me. My confusion was from not understanding how part number 3F9375 as shown on the parts diagram was related to joining the cylinder and head assemblies. With further prompting, I now see that the bracket spanning both the head assembly and gasket part numbers means that the gasket is for the whole head assembly rather than where the arrow points. Sometimes I don't see the forest from being too focused on the trees, but will get better with practice. I also appreciate seeing the parts diagram for the older style cylinder that shows what I actually have.

In order to change this gasket, I assume that the ram should be removed from the tractor and the rod must be removed from the head assembly, so it would also be a good time to change the packing and any other gaskets that need to be removed. Is there also an internal seal that I should be replacing?

Thanks to everyone for the suggestions. This has been very helpful! Tomorrow I can start trying to remove the rams, which will probably lead to spilling hydraulic fluid (that my wife has found very hard to get out of the work clothes).

JRMunn
The piston seals may need changing and I have found current parts do not fit very well and result in blown seals. The fix is to add 1/16" thick teflon back up rings, one for each of the seals. Piston will need to be removed from rod to replace the 3F9375 seal. Also need to know that the sealing surface is in good shape.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Tue, Dec 17, 2013 10:22 AM
STEPHEN
Offline
Send a private message to STEPHEN
Posts: 2,461
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Old Magnet:
Here is the old style cylinder.
Cylinder change was is the early 50's, have to go by the part number stamped on the cylinder head.
Yes, some aftermarket set ups used the Cat cylinders and hydraulic system.

3F9375 is the correct number for the brass seal, I still have some in original package. The one set of cylinders I have open does not have provision for o-ring and no gasket is called out for the interface between the tube assy and the cylinder head.

You guys are sure hard to convince.
[quote="Old Magnet"]Here is the old style cylinder.
Cylinder change was is the early 50's, have to go by the part number stamped on the cylinder head.
Yes, some aftermarket set ups used the Cat cylinders and hydraulic system.

3F9375 is the correct number for the brass seal, I still have some in original package. The one set of cylinders I have open does not have provision for o-ring and no gasket is called out for the interface between the tube assy and the cylinder head.

You guys are sure hard to convince.[/quote]

Well I guess I have seen the old style cylinder, because that is exact piston seal that I have. So is there an even older version? as the pic of the leaky cyl looks different than the posted break down of the early cylinder, if you look where the ell threads into the head it is shaped different, more rounded at the port instead of the usual squarish look, or maybe the tube was removed and the head tapped? Just a little hard for me to see from lighting and camera angle. That is a good tip about the teflon back-up. I see you have an Allpax cutter, I have one as well & they sure make a clean cut. I haven't checked the catalog for that size, but a wide range of hyd seals, back-up rings and wipers can be bought online direct from the manufacturer (Hercules) in Florida, just the rod wiper selection alone is huge.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Tue, Dec 17, 2013 12:35 PM
Old Magnet
Offline
Send a private message to Old Magnet
Posts: 16,694
Thank you received: 16
Reply to STEPHEN:
[quote="Old Magnet"]Here is the old style cylinder.
Cylinder change was is the early 50's, have to go by the part number stamped on the cylinder head.
Yes, some aftermarket set ups used the Cat cylinders and hydraulic system.

3F9375 is the correct number for the brass seal, I still have some in original package. The one set of cylinders I have open does not have provision for o-ring and no gasket is called out for the interface between the tube assy and the cylinder head.

You guys are sure hard to convince.[/quote]

Well I guess I have seen the old style cylinder, because that is exact piston seal that I have. So is there an even older version? as the pic of the leaky cyl looks different than the posted break down of the early cylinder, if you look where the ell threads into the head it is shaped different, more rounded at the port instead of the usual squarish look, or maybe the tube was removed and the head tapped? Just a little hard for me to see from lighting and camera angle. That is a good tip about the teflon back-up. I see you have an Allpax cutter, I have one as well & they sure make a clean cut. I haven't checked the catalog for that size, but a wide range of hyd seals, back-up rings and wipers can be bought online direct from the manufacturer (Hercules) in Florida, just the rod wiper selection alone is huge.
Only two versions of the Cat dozer cylinders that I'm aware of, both shown. Can't say for sure if the one in the picture is Cat or not but the head to cylinder joint sure looks the same. If it is Cat there should be a part number either on the head assy or at the mounting end of the cylinder.

Yes, the teflon material was cut with the Allpax. Source of material was McMaster.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Tue, Dec 17, 2013 1:19 PM
Showing 1 to 10 of 13 results
1
YouTube Video Placeholder

Follow Us on Social Media

Our channel highlights machines from the earliest Holt and Best track-type tractors, equipment from the start of Caterpillar in 1925, up to units built in the mid-1960s.

Upcoming Events

Veerkamp Open House 2025

Chapter Fifteen

| Placerville, CA

Stradsett Park Vintage Rally

Chapter Two

| Stradsett, Nr Downham Market. Norfolk PE33 9HA UK

Chapter 2 The Link Club's AGM

Chapter Two

| Faulkner Farm, West Drove, Wisbech, Cambridgeshire, PE14 7DP, UK
View Calendar
ACMOC

Antique Caterpillar
Machinery Owners Club

1115 Madison St NE # 1117
Salem, OR 97301

[email protected]

Terms & Privacy
Website developed by AdCo

Testimonials

"I also joined a year ago. had been on here a couple of times as a non-member and found the info very helpful so I got a one year subscription (not very expensive at all) to try it out. I really like all the resources on here so I just got a three year. I think its a very small price for what you can get out of this site."
-Jason N

Join Today!