ACMOC
Login
ACMOC
Should I or shouldn't I?

Should I or shouldn't I?

Showing 1 to 5 of 5 results
farmerfred
Topic Author
Offline
Send a private message to farmerfred
Posts: 27
Thank you received: 0
Have a cousin with a 7E47A low horsepower tractor that is in good shape. All he does with it is dozer work. He gets no exhaust smoke whatsoever. He is wondering if he fueled it up to a high horse 7E47A, would it hurt anything? Just wondered if anybody had tried it and how it worked for them? I told him he should put a boost gauge on it for a before and after test and that would also tell him how much horsepower he had and how much of it he was using.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Thu, Jan 2, 2014 12:16 PM
Deas Plant.
Online
Member
Send a private message to Deas Plant.
Location: Currently - DowNunda.
Posts: 6,661
Thank you received: 18
Hi, FarmerFred.
Re boosting the early 47A to later Hi-horse 47A 'grunt' capacity, it is my understanding that the turbos were different as well. I am pretty sure that the later units had a smaller bore turbo with a higher output and efficiency to match the altered fuel settings. These same turbos also had a larger exhaust outlet that connected to a larger stack to allow better exhaust outflow. I also vaguely remember a different air cleaner being fitted.

On the 'Love-That-Sound' side, they also had a somewhat deeper 'bark' than the earlier tractors.

Some of the more 'technical' people will likely chime in here shortly with possibly better info on this topic.

Just my 0.02

You have a wonderful day. Best wishes. Deas Plant.

Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Thu, Jan 2, 2014 2:07 PM
djcat
Offline
Send a private message to djcat
Posts: 98
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Deas Plant.:
Hi, FarmerFred.
Re boosting the early 47A to later Hi-horse 47A 'grunt' capacity, it is my understanding that the turbos were different as well. I am pretty sure that the later units had a smaller bore turbo with a higher output and efficiency to match the altered fuel settings. These same turbos also had a larger exhaust outlet that connected to a larger stack to allow better exhaust outflow. I also vaguely remember a different air cleaner being fitted.

On the 'Love-That-Sound' side, they also had a somewhat deeper 'bark' than the earlier tractors.

Some of the more 'technical' people will likely chime in here shortly with possibly better info on this topic.

Just my 0.02
I think from memory the dead axle was smaller on 160hp tractors.

Cheers djcat
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Thu, Jan 2, 2014 4:02 PM
Rome K/G
Offline
Send a private message to Rome K/G
Posts: 6,092
Thank you received: 0
Reply to djcat:
I think from memory the dead axle was smaller on 160hp tractors.

Cheers djcat
Sounds like its running like it should. Turning it up and rolling smoke out the stack isn't the best for the engine, you just waste fuel and wash the cylinder liners and reduce engine life. The turbos are the same for the low and high horse just the elbows were changed for the dust ejector system for the air cleaner. The early sevens had the old style turbo like the 17as but the replacement turbo is the later style. Rpm for the low horse high idle is 1325 and the high horse is 1350.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Thu, Jan 2, 2014 8:00 PM
Rome K/G
Offline
Send a private message to Rome K/G
Posts: 6,092
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Rome K/G:
Sounds like its running like it should. Turning it up and rolling smoke out the stack isn't the best for the engine, you just waste fuel and wash the cylinder liners and reduce engine life. The turbos are the same for the low and high horse just the elbows were changed for the dust ejector system for the air cleaner. The early sevens had the old style turbo like the 17as but the replacement turbo is the later style. Rpm for the low horse high idle is 1325 and the high horse is 1350.
There is a difference in rack settings also.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Thu, Jan 2, 2014 8:01 PM
seiscat
Offline
Send a private message to seiscat
Posts: 1,319
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Rome K/G:
There is a difference in rack settings also.
There are several differences between low and high horse, most noteable is the much larger diameter dead axles. The air cleaners are also very different. If it ain't broke... Up the rack too much and and you risk finding the next weakest link. Sorry I did not notice this post sooner.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Tue, Jan 14, 2014 7:09 AM
Showing 1 to 5 of 5 results
YouTube Video Placeholder

Follow Us on Social Media

Our channel highlights machines from the earliest Holt and Best track-type tractors, equipment from the start of Caterpillar in 1925, up to units built in the mid-1960s.

Upcoming Events

Chapter 2 The Link Club's AGM

Chapter Two

| Faulkner Farm, West Drove, Wisbech, Cambridgeshire, PE14 7DP, UK

HAMILTON PASTURAL MUSEUM

Chapter Nineteen

| Cnr Hiller Lane and Ballarat Road, Hamilton, Vic, 3300

RUSSELL SAYWELL WORKING DAY

Chapter Two

| Pitt Farm, Little Paxton, St Neots, Cambridgeshire, PE19 6HD, UK

10th Annual Best of the West

Chapter Fifteen

| Historic Santa Margarita Ranch, 20000 El Camino Real, Santa Margarita, CA 93453, USA
View Calendar
ACMOC

Antique Caterpillar
Machinery Owners Club

1115 Madison St NE # 1117
Salem, OR 97301

[email protected]

Terms & Privacy
Website developed by AdCo

Testimonials

"I also joined a year ago. had been on here a couple of times as a non-member and found the info very helpful so I got a one year subscription (not very expensive at all) to try it out. I really like all the resources on here so I just got a three year. I think its a very small price for what you can get out of this site."
-Jason N

Join Today!