ACMOC
Login | Register
ACMOC
Part number8N8796

Part number8N8796

Showing 1 to 7 of 7 results
d4e
Topic Author
Offline
Member
Send a private message to d4e
Posts: 488
Thank you received: 0
Does anyone recognize this number I gave four. It’s a injector nozzle. I check all my D2 and D4 books as well as 78P book I can’t find a match . I’m wanting to put new injectors in my Late D2. DE engine thanks John.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Sat, May 9, 2020 12:16 AM
Old Magnet
Offline
Send a private message to Old Magnet
Posts: 16,667
Thank you received: 0
That's a really old valve service group number, now obsolete.
Current use is a 6H3364 valve service group that uses a 9F4113 nozzle.
The service group just adds o-ring seals.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Sat, May 9, 2020 3:50 AM
d4e
Topic Author
Offline
Member
Send a private message to d4e
Posts: 488
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Old Magnet:
That's a really old valve service group number, now obsolete.
Current use is a 6H3364 valve service group that uses a 9F4113 nozzle.
The service group just adds o-ring seals.
Thanks OM . Not sure how I came upon these I thought they were for one of my D2s or D4s .
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Sat, May 9, 2020 10:09 PM
Old Magnet
Offline
Send a private message to Old Magnet
Posts: 16,667
Thank you received: 0
Reply to d4e:
Thanks OM . Not sure how I came upon these I thought they were for one of my D2s or D4s .
Started out as a 7S9891 service group with 7S8722 nozzle superceded by a 8N8796 service group with 8N4694 nozzle then 6H3364 service group with 9F4113 nozzle.
All good for the D311, D315, D318. Not for D311H model.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Sat, May 9, 2020 11:34 PM
Rome K/G
Offline
Send a private message to Rome K/G
Posts: 6,092
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Old Magnet:
Started out as a 7S9891 service group with 7S8722 nozzle superceded by a 8N8796 service group with 8N4694 nozzle then 6H3364 service group with 9F4113 nozzle.
All good for the D311, D315, D318. Not for D311H model.
Mag, some D315's listed different settings in the rack setting chart book for use with counterbored and non counterbored fuel injection capsules, which ones are still being used? Or are both still being used?
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Sun, May 10, 2020 6:06 AM
Old Magnet
Offline
Send a private message to Old Magnet
Posts: 16,667
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Rome K/G:
Mag, some D315's listed different settings in the rack setting chart book for use with counterbored and non counterbored fuel injection capsules, which ones are still being used? Or are both still being used?
Non counterbored nozzles went by the wayside a long time ago. I don't have any info to identify them by number. The original counterbored valve service group was a 9F5937 which equates to a 6H3364 VSG with 9F4113 nozzle now. Lots of numbers in between but they are all counterbored type.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Sun, May 10, 2020 11:22 AM
edb
Offline
Member
Send a private message to edb
Posts: 4,027
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Old Magnet:
Non counterbored nozzles went by the wayside a long time ago. I don't have any info to identify them by number. The original counterbored valve service group was a 9F5937 which equates to a 6H3364 VSG with 9F4113 nozzle now. Lots of numbers in between but they are all counterbored type.
Hi Team,
these scans should be all the info available on these.

Hope some of it helps as it will likely make things more confusing---as OM said, Counterbored nozzles went by the wayside years ago and when setting Injection Pump Racks I am fairly sure we ran with the Rack Setting that suited the S/No as per the Rack Charts.
As said in one of the scans that individual Straight bore nozzles can be replaced by Counterbored nozzles but if at more than half need replacing then it is recommended that all should be replaced to make for a smoother running engine.
This seems to indicate that there would not be much difference in engine output with either type nozzle--I stand to be corrected.

Cheers,
Eddie B.
Attachment
Attachment
Attachment
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Sun, May 10, 2020 1:35 PM
Old Magnet
Offline
Send a private message to Old Magnet
Posts: 16,667
Thank you received: 0
Reply to edb:
Hi Team,
these scans should be all the info available on these.

Hope some of it helps as it will likely make things more confusing---as OM said, Counterbored nozzles went by the wayside years ago and when setting Injection Pump Racks I am fairly sure we ran with the Rack Setting that suited the S/No as per the Rack Charts.
As said in one of the scans that individual Straight bore nozzles can be replaced by Counterbored nozzles but if at more than half need replacing then it is recommended that all should be replaced to make for a smoother running engine.
This seems to indicate that there would not be much difference in engine output with either type nozzle--I stand to be corrected.

Cheers,
Eddie B.
Attachment
Attachment
Attachment
Add these two to the mix but it still does not help identify non-counterbored and counterbored nozzles.
Attachment
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Sun, May 10, 2020 10:07 PM
Showing 1 to 7 of 7 results
YouTube Video Placeholder

Follow Us on Social Media

Our channel highlights machines from the earliest Holt and Best track-type tractors, equipment from the start of Caterpillar in 1925, up to units built in the mid-1960s.

Upcoming Events

KORUMBURRA WORKING HORSE & TRACTOR & 100 YEARS OF CAT RALLY

Chapter Nineteen

| 5875 STH GIPPSLAND HWY, NYORA

Booleroo 2025

Chapter Thirty

| Booleroo Centre, 54 Arthur St, Booleroo Centre SA 5482, Australia

CAFES 2025 TULARE, CALIFORNIA

Chapter Fifteen

| Tulare, California

Wheatlands Warracknabeal Easter Rally

Chapter Nineteen

| 34 Henty Hwy, Warracknabeal
View Calendar
ACMOC

Antique Caterpillar
Machinery Owners Club

1115 Madison St NE # 1117
Salem, OR 97301

[email protected]

Terms & Privacy
Website developed by AdCo

Testimonials

"I also joined a year ago. had been on here a couple of times as a non-member and found the info very helpful so I got a one year subscription (not very expensive at all) to try it out. I really like all the resources on here so I just got a three year. I think its a very small price for what you can get out of this site."
-Jason N

Join Today!