ACMOC
Login
ACMOC
Mechanical Aptitude Test

Mechanical Aptitude Test

Showing 1 to 10 of 17 results
1
§wishy
Topic Author
Offline
Send a private message to §wishy
Posts: 331
Thank you received: 0
[b]C how U fare

clikn here will getcha there
http://www.forddoctorsdts.com/quizzes/MechanicalAptitude.php


Jist read the 1st page n clik START

cya
§wishy
HasBeen[/b]
[CENTER]🙄 - : [B]ButEyeDoSt&2BCorrected : - 😛
Ifn U Get my Drift[/b]
😮 [/CENTER]
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Sun, Oct 28, 2007 7:24 AM
Ron Gordon
Offline
Send a private message to Ron Gordon
Posts: 49
Thank you received: 0
I took that test on another site,got an 82 on it.Humiliating.I got the electrical part just fine,the pulleys can get to ya,one of them I ended up guessing at.LOL
Some of the questions are not phrased properly and can get you in trouble and some have multiple answers so be sure and read them ALL before you select the proper one.It was an eye opener for me and I guess I needed it.😊
There were several replies on the forum where I found it and nobody aced it but there were a few in the 90s.I bet if I took it again..............Ron G😄 😄
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Sun, Oct 28, 2007 6:21 PM
Jon
Offline
Send a private message to Jon
Posts: 155
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Ron Gordon:
I took that test on another site,got an 82 on it.Humiliating.I got the electrical part just fine,the pulleys can get to ya,one of them I ended up guessing at.LOL
Some of the questions are not phrased properly and can get you in trouble and some have multiple answers so be sure and read them ALL before you select the proper one.It was an eye opener for me and I guess I needed it.😊
There were several replies on the forum where I found it and nobody aced it but there were a few in the 90s.I bet if I took it again..............Ron G😄 😄
I got 90, should have done better.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Sun, Oct 28, 2007 9:59 PM
Jack
Offline
Member
Send a private message to Jack
Posts: 817
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Jon:
I got 90, should have done better.
Not meaning to brag, but I got 98 on the test. What concerns me: Does this mean that I'm a Ford tractor man rather than a Cat man? Scary.😮
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Mon, Oct 29, 2007 5:22 AM
pasochris
Offline
Send a private message to pasochris
Posts: 92
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Jack:
Not meaning to brag, but I got 98 on the test. What concerns me: Does this mean that I'm a Ford tractor man rather than a Cat man? Scary.😮
That was a fun test, I got a 92. Several of those questions are somewhat incomplete and ambiguous and could have multiple correct answers in my opinion depending on how one fills in the missing details.
Chris Clarke
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Mon, Oct 29, 2007 5:53 AM
ETD66SS
Offline
Send a private message to ETD66SS
Posts: 619
Thank you received: 0
I got 86%

I guess I gave up kinda quick on some of the block & tackle questions...

I did this at work, so blew through it pretty fast...
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Tue, Oct 30, 2007 2:44 AM
daron
Offline
Member
Send a private message to daron
Posts: 607
Thank you received: 1
Reply to ETD66SS:
I got 86%

I guess I gave up kinda quick on some of the block & tackle questions...

I did this at work, so blew through it pretty fast...
Got 90%. Like to know which I missed.

Daron
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Tue, Oct 30, 2007 12:58 PM
Ron Gordon
Offline
Send a private message to Ron Gordon
Posts: 49
Thank you received: 0
Reply to daron:
Got 90%. Like to know which I missed.

Daron
I was under pressure to do something else and could not give it the concentration it deserved but the phrasing of the questions gave me my biggest percentage of mistakes.If you click on one of the icons at the top of the page you can review each question and answer.That pulley question with the multiple reductions was the one I guessed at and since it didn't say what size the pulleys were there was no way to accurate calculate the ratio without making some assumptions.I missed 9 questions.......rather correct answers.Ron G😮
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Tue, Oct 30, 2007 6:33 PM
pasochris
Offline
Send a private message to pasochris
Posts: 92
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Ron Gordon:
I was under pressure to do something else and could not give it the concentration it deserved but the phrasing of the questions gave me my biggest percentage of mistakes.If you click on one of the icons at the top of the page you can review each question and answer.That pulley question with the multiple reductions was the one I guessed at and since it didn't say what size the pulleys were there was no way to accurate calculate the ratio without making some assumptions.I missed 9 questions.......rather correct answers.Ron G😮
Ron,

If your talking about the same pulley question I am thinking of, 3 pulleys on top and 2 on the bottom, the pulley diameter doesn't actually matter. The trick to it is that the tension in the rope is uniform and therefore must be equal to the force exerted by the hand in the drawing. The pulleys only change the direction of the tension force, not its magnitude. If you draw a horizontal line across the middle of the picture and "cut off" the top half of the system then 5 rope leads remain that support the weight. Because the tension is uniform throughout the rope, the total force applied to the weight is 5 times the force applied by the hand. The price paid for this mechanical advantage is that to lift the weight a given distance, the rope must be pulled 5 times that distance.

I always loved problems like that...
Chris Clarke
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Wed, Oct 31, 2007 8:11 AM
Will D68U
Offline
Send a private message to Will D68U
Posts: 5
Thank you received: 0
Reply to pasochris:
Ron,

If your talking about the same pulley question I am thinking of, 3 pulleys on top and 2 on the bottom, the pulley diameter doesn't actually matter. The trick to it is that the tension in the rope is uniform and therefore must be equal to the force exerted by the hand in the drawing. The pulleys only change the direction of the tension force, not its magnitude. If you draw a horizontal line across the middle of the picture and "cut off" the top half of the system then 5 rope leads remain that support the weight. Because the tension is uniform throughout the rope, the total force applied to the weight is 5 times the force applied by the hand. The price paid for this mechanical advantage is that to lift the weight a given distance, the rope must be pulled 5 times that distance.

I always loved problems like that...
Great test got a 96. Sent the test around work got some real surprises.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Wed, Oct 31, 2007 9:19 AM
ccjersey
Offline
Send a private message to ccjersey
Posts: 4,422
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Will D68U:
Great test got a 96. Sent the test around work got some real surprises.
You would have to go back and take it again, but when you get your score, use the magnefying glass icon at the top right of the page and you can go back and review each question, your answers and the correct answer. Correct is green at top, incorrect is red and says incorrect.
D2-5J's, D6-9U's, D318 and D333 power units, 12E-99E grader, 922B & 944A wheel loaders, D330C generator set, DW20 water tanker and a bunch of Jersey cows to take care of in my spare time😄
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Wed, Oct 31, 2007 9:56 AM
Showing 1 to 10 of 17 results
1
YouTube Video Placeholder

Follow Us on Social Media

Our channel highlights machines from the earliest Holt and Best track-type tractors, equipment from the start of Caterpillar in 1925, up to units built in the mid-1960s.

Upcoming Events

Sibbertoft Annual Muck Shifting Weekend

Chapter Two

| Avalanche adventure, Welford Rd, Sibbertoft LE16 9UJ, UK

Cromford Steam Rally

Chapter Two

| Highacres Farm, Dewey Lane, Brackenfield, Derbyshire DE55 6DB, UK

The Century of Caterpillar

| Elkader, 203 Johnson St, Elkader, IA 52043, USA

100 YEARS OF CATERPILLAR IN TASMANIA

Chapter Nineteen

| 2 Winkleigh Rd, Exeter TAS 7275
View Calendar
ACMOC

Antique Caterpillar
Machinery Owners Club

1115 Madison St NE # 1117
Salem, OR 97301

[email protected]

Terms & Privacy
Website developed by AdCo

Testimonials

"I also joined a year ago. had been on here a couple of times as a non-member and found the info very helpful so I got a one year subscription (not very expensive at all) to try it out. I really like all the resources on here so I just got a three year. I think its a very small price for what you can get out of this site."
-Jason N

Join Today!