American Bosch mags came in A, B, C, D models.....all pretty much alike.
I show the 410 models as having a part number ICK 2A4-30 deg. impulse coupling assy and assigned to the industrial engine D6
The 408 models have a ICK 2A2-30 deg. impulse coupling assy and are designated for the D6 tractor.
Yes, towards the end of the D6"U" run they switched to the WICO mags and used them on into the D6B production. (To me they are not built as well as the AB units.)
Thanks guys for the answers and information and I appreciate all the mag numbers you put together KidNV. Nice job! That will come in handy. I was able to fix my impulse problem by robbing the weights and plate from a six cylinder Bosch I had laying around that came off a MM power unit. I was surprised they used the same parts. Thanks again, Rick
Ok,
So Pulled the cap off my magneto MJK 4/2 360C-47 and the pulled the rotor off. It disintegrated in my hand. Iām thinking this is the source of my pony engine problems. Now the rest of the rotor (Brass piece) seems seized in the shaft. I pulled on it and pulled the whole gear shaft out. Iām worried that there was a snap ring and washer on the back of the shaft that popped off and is now lost inside the mag, so far have not found it. It could be stuck to the magnets inside the.
I also have a MJK 4/2 180 A311 with all good parts.
Question: Can I swap back flanges, drive gear, points, etc. and run the 4/2 180 clock wise or will it not spark rotating the opposite way, maybe due to the windings in the armature?
Thanks in advance!
Jeff T
I misread above. Since both part numbers are odd, they are both ccw, so there should be no roation issues.
So the real questions are:
1. Am I missing a retaining ring/washer?
2. Can I swap rear flangs and use the other mag?
3. Timing for reinstall?
Thanks again,
Jeff T
hello tarquj ,the sheet i have for the Bosch magneto says all the parts are the same expect parts 2,3,4B and 67B,
MJK4/2 360 is clockwise rotation and MJk4/2 180 anti clock wise rotation ,
http://img685.yfrog.com/gal.php?g=79698014.jpg
.
bruce oz
Hi Bruce, thanks for the reply,
I didn't get a chance to tinker with the Mags last night, but I'll try again tonight.
Are you sure about this? this contradicts what kidNV states above although he also caveats his list by "I can not state that I have made no errors, this took some time (too much time). " But, according to this:
-MJK 4/2 180' A311Y ccw / flange mounting
-MJK 4/2 360' C47 ccw / horizontal flange mounting
This supports my theory that only the mounting flanges are different (with a few minor casting changes, etc.), once flanges swapped I should be good to go... the 180' vs 360' looks to be the flange designation while the last numeric character odd vs even correlates to ccw vs cw rotation. This is consistent through the entire list.
One more thing about the 180 mag, we used the cap from the 180 on the 360 years ago. We had to cross the plug wires to get it to run, but couldn't remember if that was the stock config or if it was the difference in mags causing the need for cross wiring. I'm wondering if that is another difference in 180 vs 360... Another note, the 180' came from an earlier dozer (no clue about serial number, was in a bone yard) than the 955 which was running with the 360'.
Jeff T
hello tarquj sorry for the miss info,i did miss reading the c47 when i was reading the mag infošmokin:.kidNV info is better than mine .it is hard picking up mag info with so many models fitted to the cats ,in the link it looks like the flanges are diff part like you say .bruce oz