Reply to Cat-astrophe:
[quote="chriscokid"]I think everyone is well aware that a new source(s) of income is needed for the club to maintain and or grow.
Instead of pointing out what is wrong, may be a different approach is when these areas of concern are highlighted a possible solution (even if short term) is also suggested.
Grandpa always said "Its easy to find a problem but can be very difficult to find a solution"[/quote]
Hello Erik
Nice to see you following this post. You have posted this quote in the past, and as a member of the Website and Magazine committee you have had the opportunity over the past period to act on the words. Given the circumstances there are proactive steps that could have been taken some months ago, by the Website and Magazine committee. Just off the top of my head:
1. Look to change the Magazine back to 4 times a year in an orderly and cost effective manner.
2. Ensure that the contract for the production of the Magazine was prudent and had flexibility to allow 1. above to occur if it was ever necessary
3. Offer a discounted Subscription for a PDF version of the Magazine which is emailed out.
4. Follow up on the bulk mailing of International magazines to International Members
5. Look to generate advertising revenue from the Website.
Were none of these initiatives followed up because the Board did not have timely, clear and accurate financial information??? Will we see a mixture of the above initiates being announced in coming weeks by the Board now that the financial position is apparent even to the financially blind and deaf??
I can make these comments because I wrote to the President in June 2018 in a four page letter outlining concerns on the financial position that I was able to analyse from the Magazine. He spoke to my letter at the Peoria meeting, where the matters I raised I understand were "poo hoo-ed" but since proven accurate. Andy has confirmed in his post two days ago that he never acknowledged or replied to my letter. I gave the President two opportunities to respond to me and work on solutions off line - which were not taken. The time for this has passed, but obviously there was no need felt to explore my concerns, or explore the solutions I may have had. Help has to be wanted!!
This situation is not about needing more revenue sources as you suggest in your post - but that would help. This is about a Board of Directors not knowing the true financial position of the club, nor exercising prudent governance, nor implementing appropriate business strategies to changing circumstances. evidence the D4 order placed in June 2018. Lets see what the 2017 & 2018 Minutes show when they are posted on the member only section. But a Governance question is my haven't they being posted monthly on the way thru...…..
Experience has shown me many times that people that get a business or an organisation INTO the "brown stuff" are not the people to get it OUT of the "brown stuff". I agree with your Grandpa - finding solutions is harder than problems. SO one immediate solution could be to clear the Board of people that have allowed this situation to develop and go unanswered.
Hudson
Good evening to all
First to clear up some misconceptions.
Mike, yes reimbursement of directors expense is allowed, it is capped at $500 USD and may only be use for airfare if flying, or mileage if driving.
I to have several gray cats in restoration that I to could use affordable parts for, gauges being one for example. Past Director Dan W worked on this for 2 years, the issue in this case is not being able to source the internal mechanism to fit the odd sized gauge case, and no one willing to fabricate new cases in the limited quantities that are desired. It was determined the best course of action was to proceed with the gauge faces, and glass. We have also looked at head gaskets for example. If you compare the product sourced out of the Asian region with that which comes from the US their is a vast difference, quality and yes price. Given their use and that it is assumed that the parts are Caterpillar, whether they come from Caterpillar or not, a standard must be maintained to defend the brand.
The issue with the models is that there is no other product that we can create that provides as great a ROI. Of course we can sell hats, gloves, books, flashlight and the like, but so can everyone else, what was needed was a product unique to us, that could be controlled by us. The program began long before I even joined ACMOC, and it is the only reason that as Hudson has stated we had assets of $800K+.
Magnet, honestly we did not feel that any non member ACMOC would purchase a membership on the BB only. We do know the cost of the BB, it is listed in the magazine bi monthly as Website expenses, these do of course also cover the rest of the site, but they are extremely intertwined and not something that could be separated easily, on this I do have to trust other for this information as I am not a software engineer. If enough interest could be shown in this, it is relatively easy to add this type of item to the store, it would take some programming I am sure, and like every other thing in life there are costs involved, but it should be further explored.
Hudson, we have not paid $18K for the models, no models were ordered and could not be until a prototype was produced, evaluated and approved by Caterpillar. If you look back at the BB the process was documented for the previous D4 models. We have taken some steps to evaluate our cost structure and have slowed the program down, true the total cost when all tooling, and initial purchase is made it totals a significant sum, however once the sales are made an even greater amount is realized.
Your committee analysis was almost correct, Bill is the Vice President, you left off the Executive Committee of which I am the Chairman of, the Presidents Committee which includes myself and the past 3 Presidents. As Mike mentioned and you also brought up that the handling of magazines should be looked into, that has in fact already happened, your current issue was sent to the AU post for handling and mailing at a greatly reduced rate, this was in the works a more than a month ago, but you have to wait to actually produce the magazine, which I do apologize for being late this issue, their were some issues at the publishing house.
Indeed "Cleaning House" could be an option, but who do you fill it with? There was only 1 person that volunteered to fill a term, 2 positions are open to write in. During your 2 years on the Board you worked along with Pete to create our current financial structure and reporting system, but did not seek re-election. Mike I do agree, this position has become more thankless, but also to Eric's point, highlight solutions, just as Magnet has.
Andy