ACMOC
Login
ACMOC
Diesel Fifty Track Adjustment Bolt Repair

Diesel Fifty Track Adjustment Bolt Repair

Showing 1 to 7 of 7 results
steamdrum1
Topic Author
Offline
Send a private message to steamdrum1
Posts: 107
Thank you received: 0
Hello, I have been working on the track adjustment bolt on my Diesel Fifty. A Previous owner twisted the end of the bolt off while trying to adjust the track. I thought it might be interesting to some to see the process so I snapped a few pictures along the way. The fact that the bolt twisted off right at the nut that holds preassure on the coil spring presented a special challange, as there was no way to release tension on the spring. I welded up a cage made of 5/8 rebar to hold the compression on the spring and keep it in alingment while I cut off the nut, and drove the broken bolt out. The assembly is now ready for the new bolt which should be here next week. I will be happy to get everything back together and have the tractor going again.
Attachment
Attachment
Attachment
Attachment
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Sat, Aug 4, 2012 11:22 PM
rmyram
Offline
Send a private message to rmyram
Posts: 598
Thank you received: 0
Gee whiz, there must be a clanging noise when you walk from the brass clanging together. I would never have trusted rebar to have the strength to hold that spring while taking the bolt out of it. it looks like you did a good job of building the cage and got it apart safely. we always used 3/8" X 1 1/2" flat iron for side straps welded to a 3/4" plate of steel on each end with a hole cut in them for the tie bolt to fit through to build a cage for those big recoil springs.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Sat, Aug 4, 2012 11:37 PM
dpendzic
Offline
Send a private message to dpendzic
Posts: 2,763
Thank you received: 1
Reply to rmyram:
Gee whiz, there must be a clanging noise when you walk from the brass clanging together. I would never have trusted rebar to have the strength to hold that spring while taking the bolt out of it. it looks like you did a good job of building the cage and got it apart safely. we always used 3/8" X 1 1/2" flat iron for side straps welded to a 3/4" plate of steel on each end with a hole cut in them for the tie bolt to fit through to build a cage for those big recoil springs.
I have to agree with rmyram that 4- 5/8 rebar is sorta light. At .31 si at a working stress of 20000 psi each rebar would have a 6200 tensile load--so four would be 24,800 lbs--but there is stress concentrations at the bends. I don't know what the spring compression load is on a diesel 50 but i know on my 941b we measured over 28000 lbs on the hydraulic press to compress a new recoil spring. Glad it worked ok for you!
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Sun, Aug 5, 2012 12:04 AM
Old Magnet
Offline
Send a private message to Old Magnet
Posts: 16,695
Thank you received: 17
Reply to dpendzic:
I have to agree with rmyram that 4- 5/8 rebar is sorta light. At .31 si at a working stress of 20000 psi each rebar would have a 6200 tensile load--so four would be 24,800 lbs--but there is stress concentrations at the bends. I don't know what the spring compression load is on a diesel 50 but i know on my 941b we measured over 28000 lbs on the hydraulic press to compress a new recoil spring. Glad it worked ok for you!
Not quite......last time I checked, grade 40 rebar (40,000 yield) in 5/8" (#5) would be good for 12,400 lb tensile load ea.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Sun, Aug 5, 2012 1:18 AM
dpendzic
Offline
Send a private message to dpendzic
Posts: 2,763
Thank you received: 1
Reply to Old Magnet:
Not quite......last time I checked, grade 40 rebar (40,000 yield) in 5/8" (#5) would be good for 12,400 lb tensile load ea.
Pete--in steel design we never used yield or tensile strength--used the allowable working load--the older bridge design codes allowed 20 ksi for 40 ksi yield--but there are some architect codes that would allow 24 ksi working load for grade 40, there are grade 60 and 80 rebars also but they don't take bends very well.

Working stress design was a more safer and simple way to design. Nowadays with costs so high Load Factor Design is used a lot, and can save substantial money on large quantities of steel.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Sun, Aug 5, 2012 3:46 AM
steamdrum1
Topic Author
Offline
Send a private message to steamdrum1
Posts: 107
Thank you received: 0
Reply to dpendzic:
Pete--in steel design we never used yield or tensile strength--used the allowable working load--the older bridge design codes allowed 20 ksi for 40 ksi yield--but there are some architect codes that would allow 24 ksi working load for grade 40, there are grade 60 and 80 rebars also but they don't take bends very well.

Working stress design was a more safer and simple way to design. Nowadays with costs so high Load Factor Design is used a lot, and can save substantial money on large quantities of steel.
I wish I owned a large press to handle that sort of work, but I had to use what was on hand. At any rate it held fine and it is now apart so I can put the new bolt in. Don't get me wrong, I did not have any body parts in the line of fire(which you shouldn't anyhow) and if I had any doubts I would not have done it in the first place. I think I will go get a cold beverage now Clank....Clank.... as I walk away from the computer😊
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Sun, Aug 5, 2012 5:04 AM
Tim Matthews
Offline
Send a private message to Tim Matthews
Posts: 147
Thank you received: 0
Reply to steamdrum1:
I wish I owned a large press to handle that sort of work, but I had to use what was on hand. At any rate it held fine and it is now apart so I can put the new bolt in. Don't get me wrong, I did not have any body parts in the line of fire(which you shouldn't anyhow) and if I had any doubts I would not have done it in the first place. I think I will go get a cold beverage now Clank....Clank.... as I walk away from the computer😊
Well done!
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Sun, Aug 5, 2012 5:21 AM
Old Magnet
Offline
Send a private message to Old Magnet
Posts: 16,695
Thank you received: 17
Reply to Tim Matthews:
Well done!
Hi Dan- all true and good but a 2X safety factor seems a little rich for this application...not that I'd do it that way but it is tied together pretty good and is/was adequate for the task.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Sun, Aug 5, 2012 8:33 AM
Showing 1 to 7 of 7 results
YouTube Video Placeholder

Follow Us on Social Media

Our channel highlights machines from the earliest Holt and Best track-type tractors, equipment from the start of Caterpillar in 1925, up to units built in the mid-1960s.

Upcoming Events

Veerkamp Open House 2025

Chapter Fifteen

| Placerville, CA

Lake Goldsmith Steam and Vintage Rally

Chapter Nineteen

| 1234 Carngham-Lake Goldsmith Rd, Lake Goldsmith, Victoria, 3373, Australia

Stradsett Park Vintage Rally

Chapter Two

| Stradsett, Nr Downham Market. Norfolk PE33 9HA UK

Chapter 2 The Link Club's AGM

Chapter Two

| Faulkner Farm, West Drove, Wisbech, Cambridgeshire, PE14 7DP, UK
View Calendar
ACMOC

Antique Caterpillar
Machinery Owners Club

1115 Madison St NE # 1117
Salem, OR 97301

[email protected]

Terms & Privacy
Website developed by AdCo

Testimonials

"I became a member recently because the wealth of knowledge here is priceless." 
-Chris R

Join Today!