ACMOC
Login
ACMOC
D4 7U Steering Clutch Question

D4 7U Steering Clutch Question

Showing 1 to 6 of 6 results
Inter674
Topic Author
Offline
Send a private message to Inter674
Posts: 828
Thank you received: 0
I have a late model D4 7U equivalent and the book says the steering clutch width should measure no less than 3 1/8" . Mine measure a little less than that but I know the clutches were replaced a few years ago and were working fine before the pull down. I also have a spare set from another machine of similar age that measures exactly the same as the ones in question. Each has 11 toothed disks.

I don't want to pull it apart if I can help it, and looking closely I can see friction material on each side of the plates.

Question: is the minimum width of 3 1/8" applicable to all 7U steering clutches, or just to the early ones? I know the early ones had more plates (12 I think) and presumably may have been thicker as they were rivetted, not bonded.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Thu, Sep 6, 2012 10:47 AM
edb
Offline
Member
Send a private message to edb
Posts: 4,027
Thank you received: 0
Hi Inter674,
as announced in the June 11 1954 Service Magazine article the steering clutch has been improved.
The main change was a helical cut 8 splined hub and discs to suit.

In essence it states:-
The normal stack height thickness for the faced and steel discs of one clutch is :- 3 1/32"
The minimum worn stack height is :- 2 19/32"

It seems your clutches are right there for max. stack height.

From specs I have for the D4C 39A-40A
Max. average stack height for 11 new lined disc assem's. and 10 steel discs = 2.787" to 3.093"
Min. stack height = 2.63"
These specs seem to align with the later D4 U series clutches.
Cheers,
Eddie B.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Fri, Sep 7, 2012 10:12 AM
Ray54
Offline
Send a private message to Ray54
Posts: 1,889
Thank you received: 17
If you have the clutch out of the tractor add more plates,it will be slipping very soon if you don't.I have never seen a metallic Cat plate pile up like the fiber ones,so I have used some very thin used plates as long as the drive teeth were not real shape.They lasted much better than I hoped.Were it says add one I used 2 or 3 more than original did.Was very nerves it would be to many as I couldn't find a maximum height,but it worked.A few days ago someone posted a chart with minimum as well as maximum height for the old Cats. It may have been on Antique Caterpillar Machinery Enthusiast rather than here. Good luck to you.
Ray
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Fri, Sep 7, 2012 10:13 AM
Inter674
Topic Author
Offline
Send a private message to Inter674
Posts: 828
Thank you received: 0
Reply to edb:
Hi Inter674,
as announced in the June 11 1954 Service Magazine article the steering clutch has been improved.
The main change was a helical cut 8 splined hub and discs to suit.

In essence it states:-
The normal stack height thickness for the faced and steel discs of one clutch is :- 3 1/32"
The minimum worn stack height is :- 2 19/32"

It seems your clutches are right there for max. stack height.

From specs I have for the D4C 39A-40A
Max. average stack height for 11 new lined disc assem's. and 10 steel discs = 2.787" to 3.093"
Min. stack height = 2.63"
These specs seem to align with the later D4 U series clutches.
Cheers,
Eddie B.
[quote="edb"]Hi Inter674,
as announced in the June 11 1954 Service Magazine article the steering clutchhas been improved.
The main change was a helical cut 8 splined hub and discs to suit.

In essence it states:-
The normal stack height thickness for the faced and steel discs of one clutch is :- 3 1/32"
The minimum worn stack height is :- 2 19/32"

It seems your clutches are right there for max. stack height.

From specs I have for the D4C 39A-40A
Max. average stack height for 11 new lined disc assem's. and 10 steel discs = 2.787" to 3.093"
Min. stack height = 2.63"

Cheers,
Eddie B.[/quote]


Wow, I knew this forum was good, but this rapid response has exceeded all my expectations, and saved me a heap of work. I feel confident to leave it be now👍

Thanks again.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Fri, Sep 7, 2012 10:18 AM
Old Magnet
Offline
Send a private message to Old Magnet
Posts: 16,696
Thank you received: 18
Reply to Inter674:
[quote="edb"]Hi Inter674,
as announced in the June 11 1954 Service Magazine article the steering clutchhas been improved.
The main change was a helical cut 8 splined hub and discs to suit.

In essence it states:-
The normal stack height thickness for the faced and steel discs of one clutch is :- 3 1/32"
The minimum worn stack height is :- 2 19/32"

It seems your clutches are right there for max. stack height.

From specs I have for the D4C 39A-40A
Max. average stack height for 11 new lined disc assem's. and 10 steel discs = 2.787" to 3.093"
Min. stack height = 2.63"

Cheers,
Eddie B.[/quote]


Wow, I knew this forum was good, but this rapid response has exceeded all my expectations, and saved me a heap of work. I feel confident to leave it be now👍

Thanks again.
I had been using this chart and the specs published by General Gear.
What is correct?????
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Fri, Sep 7, 2012 9:24 PM
edb
Offline
Member
Send a private message to edb
Posts: 4,027
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Old Magnet:
I had been using this chart and the specs published by General Gear.
What is correct?????
Hi Team,
from my research (posted above) yesterday on this subject I determined that the chart OM has scanned above is correct for G, J, T, and early U Series machines with multi-fine splined inner drums and Rivetted lined discs.

With the change to the helical cut 8 splined inner drums and the Sintered bronze lined/faced discs, the Service Magazine article gives the NEW Specs for the Later style clutch, posted above.

My D4 6U1 to 6U9988 Parts Book shows a change of the following items from the former Rivetted lined discs, steel discs, and inner drum, to new sintered bronze lined discs, steel discs and inner drum at S/No 6U9782.
Sorry I do not have a 7U Parts Book to give you the change over S/No for the 7U machines.

Hope this helps someone in future.
Cheers,
Eddie B.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Sat, Sep 8, 2012 6:41 AM
Old Magnet
Offline
Send a private message to Old Magnet
Posts: 16,696
Thank you received: 18
Reply to edb:
Hi Team,
from my research (posted above) yesterday on this subject I determined that the chart OM has scanned above is correct for G, J, T, and early U Series machines with multi-fine splined inner drums and Rivetted lined discs.

With the change to the helical cut 8 splined inner drums and the Sintered bronze lined/faced discs, the Service Magazine article gives the NEW Specs for the Later style clutch, posted above.

My D4 6U1 to 6U9988 Parts Book shows a change of the following items from the former Rivetted lined discs, steel discs, and inner drum, to new sintered bronze lined discs, steel discs and inner drum at S/No 6U9782.
Sorry I do not have a 7U Parts Book to give you the change over S/No for the 7U machines.

Hope this helps someone in future.
Cheers,
Eddie B.
The 7U equivalent change occurred at s/n 26503-up.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Sat, Sep 8, 2012 8:30 AM
Showing 1 to 6 of 6 results
YouTube Video Placeholder

Follow Us on Social Media

Our channel highlights machines from the earliest Holt and Best track-type tractors, equipment from the start of Caterpillar in 1925, up to units built in the mid-1960s.

Upcoming Events

Sibbertoft Annual Muck Shifting Weekend

Chapter Two

| Avalanche adventure, Welford Rd, Sibbertoft LE16 9UJ, UK

Cromford Steam Rally

Chapter Two

| Highacres Farm, Dewey Lane, Brackenfield, Derbyshire DE55 6DB, UK

The Century of Caterpillar

| Elkader, 203 Johnson St, Elkader, IA 52043, USA

100 YEARS OF CATERPILLAR IN TASMANIA

Chapter Nineteen

| 2 Winkleigh Rd, Exeter TAS 7275
View Calendar
ACMOC

Antique Caterpillar
Machinery Owners Club

1115 Madison St NE # 1117
Salem, OR 97301

[email protected]

Terms & Privacy
Website developed by AdCo

Testimonials

"I also joined a year ago. had been on here a couple of times as a non-member and found the info very helpful so I got a one year subscription (not very expensive at all) to try it out. I really like all the resources on here so I just got a three year. I think its a very small price for what you can get out of this site."
-Jason N

Join Today!