ACMOC
Login | Register
ACMOC
D2 5U75xx hydraulic cylinders

D2 5U75xx hydraulic cylinders

Showing 1 to 9 of 9 results
Larry
Topic Author
Offline
Send a private message to Larry
Posts: 93
Thank you received: 0
Well. got my hyd cylinder kits today. Wouldn't you know it, the numbers changed and the 7J8879 which should have been a single ring is now a double one. On checking the ring diameter in the bore it fell straight to the bottom! Cylinder bore is 4.751". The new rings are .030 to 040" smaller than the bore. The old rings do not fall through. The rod seal 8C9133 is too small for the brass gland but I sm going to machine a ring to take the seal. Ordered a parts book for a D330C and got only half of the 92 pages, no attachments. I got the number for the parts book out of the Legendary Service Literature book. Luck is just not running too good these days. Anyone have similar problems with number substitutions? Anyone have any answers? Cheers, Larry.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Sun, Aug 11, 2013 9:10 AM
Old Magnet
Offline
Send a private message to Old Magnet
Posts: 16,667
Thank you received: 0
Yah, some days are like that. Where did you source the cylinder parts?
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Sun, Aug 11, 2013 9:51 AM
Larry
Topic Author
Offline
Send a private message to Larry
Posts: 93
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Old Magnet:
Yah, some days are like that. Where did you source the cylinder parts?
Old Magnet, got the parts from my Cat dealer in Mi. Never problems in the past. Someone obviously screwed up in the OD dimensions of the seal ring. Should have been just six to do both cylinders but the originals were six to each cylinder. Part numbers were changed to show three wider rings per cylinder. That number was changed to go back to six rings per cylinder. I ordered the wide ring number and got the narrow rings, one set short of total. Of all the cylinders I have repaired over the 45 years, I have never had one that the sealing rings fell straight through the cylinder. Even the old ones don't fall through, although they are worn. Makes you want to pull your hair out! The manual I ordered only had partr of the engine listed, no attachment section. All other parts books I have have attachment sections. Don't know what happened there. Cheers, Larry.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Sun, Aug 11, 2013 7:34 PM
Old Magnet
Offline
Send a private message to Old Magnet
Posts: 16,667
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Larry:
Old Magnet, got the parts from my Cat dealer in Mi. Never problems in the past. Someone obviously screwed up in the OD dimensions of the seal ring. Should have been just six to do both cylinders but the originals were six to each cylinder. Part numbers were changed to show three wider rings per cylinder. That number was changed to go back to six rings per cylinder. I ordered the wide ring number and got the narrow rings, one set short of total. Of all the cylinders I have repaired over the 45 years, I have never had one that the sealing rings fell straight through the cylinder. Even the old ones don't fall through, although they are worn. Makes you want to pull your hair out! The manual I ordered only had partr of the engine listed, no attachment section. All other parts books I have have attachment sections. Don't know what happened there. Cheers, Larry.
Here's some numbers...

Rings 8F2685 = 7J8879 = 4J2637

Packing 3F9609 = 1K7107

Seal 1B2418 RPB 9H2258 = National 450083

How do these compare with what you got?
Doesn't appear to be any shortage of these number parts out there.

On the D330C engine were you looking for tractor application or Industrial Engine?
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Sun, Aug 11, 2013 10:14 PM
Larry
Topic Author
Offline
Send a private message to Larry
Posts: 93
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Old Magnet:
Here's some numbers...

Rings 8F2685 = 7J8879 = 4J2637

Packing 3F9609 = 1K7107

Seal 1B2418 RPB 9H2258 = National 450083

How do these compare with what you got?
Doesn't appear to be any shortage of these number parts out there.

On the D330C engine were you looking for tractor application or Industrial Engine?
Old Magnet, I got the 7J8879 rings when I ordered the 8F2685. Part number 4J2637 subs up to 7J8879. References are: PB Ja 28/71, PB Apr 12/65. and Jun 12/62. I have not had time to check if I have these old parts bulletins, have some, not all. Just for fun I installed a ring (7J8879) on one of the 8F2656 pistons and it still fell through the bore. Bore appears to still be standard. Ring had a .074 end gap though. On the manual I ordered media number UEG0125S for the D330C industrial engine. This book is for my serial number but the attachment section is not with it. i have other industrial engine books and they all have the attachment section, It calls for 92 pages in the media number and all I got was 44 pages.There is no listing for radiators, water lines and other parts that may be required for an industrial engine. Just going to have to rattle some chains tomorrow. Thanks for your info. Cheers, Larry.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Mon, Aug 12, 2013 9:00 AM
edb
Offline
Member
Send a private message to edb
Posts: 4,027
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Larry:
Old Magnet, I got the 7J8879 rings when I ordered the 8F2685. Part number 4J2637 subs up to 7J8879. References are: PB Ja 28/71, PB Apr 12/65. and Jun 12/62. I have not had time to check if I have these old parts bulletins, have some, not all. Just for fun I installed a ring (7J8879) on one of the 8F2656 pistons and it still fell through the bore. Bore appears to still be standard. Ring had a .074 end gap though. On the manual I ordered media number UEG0125S for the D330C industrial engine. This book is for my serial number but the attachment section is not with it. i have other industrial engine books and they all have the attachment section, It calls for 92 pages in the media number and all I got was 44 pages.There is no listing for radiators, water lines and other parts that may be required for an industrial engine. Just going to have to rattle some chains tomorrow. Thanks for your info. Cheers, Larry.
Hi Team,
here are the only PB's I have as per Larry's list above. I have various hard bound PB's from Jan 1955 to Dec 1970.

The Apr 12 65 PB tells of the full ring teflon rings for later design cylinders--see Serial No list for the Blades these apply to.

Hope this helps.

Cheers,
Eddie B.
Attachment
Attachment
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Mon, Aug 12, 2013 9:55 AM
Larry
Topic Author
Offline
Send a private message to Larry
Posts: 93
Thank you received: 0
Reply to edb:
Hi Team,
here are the only PB's I have as per Larry's list above. I have various hard bound PB's from Jan 1955 to Dec 1970.

The Apr 12 65 PB tells of the full ring teflon rings for later design cylinders--see Serial No list for the Blades these apply to.

Hope this helps.

Cheers,
Eddie B.
Attachment
Attachment
Thanks Ed, I have some older servicegrams from the 40's and PB's into the late 60's but nothing in the 70's. It appears that most of these items for the D2's has been discontinued. While I was at at a hydraulic supply place today the owner called up a supply place in British Columbia and there was someone there looking for the same seals as I was. You would think that Cat would have some parts for these old girls as there are a number of fellows restoring them. I guess that they are forgetting that these old machines are what made them what they are today. What I don't know is where the quality inspection chaps were when the seals I got were machined. Someone definitely screwed up or does not know how to use a micrometer. Probably union help! Cheers, Larry.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Thu, Aug 15, 2013 8:44 AM
Old Magnet
Offline
Send a private message to Old Magnet
Posts: 16,667
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Larry:
Thanks Ed, I have some older servicegrams from the 40's and PB's into the late 60's but nothing in the 70's. It appears that most of these items for the D2's has been discontinued. While I was at at a hydraulic supply place today the owner called up a supply place in British Columbia and there was someone there looking for the same seals as I was. You would think that Cat would have some parts for these old girls as there are a number of fellows restoring them. I guess that they are forgetting that these old machines are what made them what they are today. What I don't know is where the quality inspection chaps were when the seals I got were machined. Someone definitely screwed up or does not know how to use a micrometer. Probably union help! Cheers, Larry.
Your not alone. Cat has lost it on the early D4 cylinders as well. Had to provide backup rings for the cup style piston seals to keep them from blowing out.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Thu, Aug 15, 2013 8:51 AM
old-iron-habit
Offline
Member
Send a private message to old-iron-habit
Posts: 3,520
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Old Magnet:
Your not alone. Cat has lost it on the early D4 cylinders as well. Had to provide backup rings for the cup style piston seals to keep them from blowing out.
My response Larry is that product quality usually goes to pots when companies go away from being a union shop. If you look at the data that's out there its pretty typical in all manufacturing that the quality suffers when a company goes non union and hires the cheapest labor they can get. Or imports from a substandard labor country. Labor does not take a lot of pride in their work when they can't make a living wage. Unfortunately the price of the part does not go down. Only the quality suffers while the company gets richer on labor s back. Don't take my word for it. Look for yourself. There are many universities studies on it that always come up with the same conclusions even though the liberal bums hate to admit it.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Thu, Aug 15, 2013 10:23 AM
neil
Offline
Admin
Send a private message to neil
Posts: 6,912
Thank you received: 0
Reply to old-iron-habit:
My response Larry is that product quality usually goes to pots when companies go away from being a union shop. If you look at the data that's out there its pretty typical in all manufacturing that the quality suffers when a company goes non union and hires the cheapest labor they can get. Or imports from a substandard labor country. Labor does not take a lot of pride in their work when they can't make a living wage. Unfortunately the price of the part does not go down. Only the quality suffers while the company gets richer on labor s back. Don't take my word for it. Look for yourself. There are many universities studies on it that always come up with the same conclusions even though the liberal bums hate to admit it.
While I like to negotiate my own contracts and working conditions, I agree with OIH regarding quality, particularly because it has echoes in outsourcing. I've been directly involved in a few projects now and have yet to see an overall improvement in all factors (quality, cost, customer satisfaction, response time, etc.) - typically the only folks that are reliably satisfied are the shareholders because cost goes down commensurate with quality (no coincidence that the majority of those outsourcing are public companies) and the guy that stitched the outsourcing deal together who personally gets a big fillip.

But, over time, folks get used to the new normal and no longer know any different. Money talks and I'm not saying it "should be" different, but it's hard to watch quality be diminished to a level that the beanies are "ok" with. In the commercial sector, at least customers get to vote with their checkbook.
Cheers,
Neil
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Thu, Aug 15, 2013 8:09 PM
Showing 1 to 9 of 9 results
YouTube Video Placeholder

Follow Us on Social Media

Our channel highlights machines from the earliest Holt and Best track-type tractors, equipment from the start of Caterpillar in 1925, up to units built in the mid-1960s.

Upcoming Events

KORUMBURRA WORKING HORSE & TRACTOR & 100 YEARS OF CAT RALLY

Chapter Nineteen

| 5875 STH GIPPSLAND HWY, NYORA

Booleroo 2025

Chapter Thirty

| Booleroo Centre, 54 Arthur St, Booleroo Centre SA 5482, Australia

CAFES 2025 TULARE, CALIFORNIA

Chapter Fifteen

| Tulare, California

Wheatlands Warracknabeal Easter Rally

Chapter Nineteen

| 34 Henty Hwy, Warracknabeal
View Calendar
ACMOC

Antique Caterpillar
Machinery Owners Club

1115 Madison St NE # 1117
Salem, OR 97301

[email protected]

Terms & Privacy
Website developed by AdCo

Testimonials

"I also joined a year ago. had been on here a couple of times as a non-member and found the info very helpful so I got a one year subscription (not very expensive at all) to try it out. I really like all the resources on here so I just got a three year. I think its a very small price for what you can get out of this site."
-Jason N

Join Today!