ACMOC
Login | Register
ACMOC
Cat 325 Excavator loss (? OT)

Cat 325 Excavator loss (? OT)

Showing 1 to 8 of 8 results
Willowhic
Topic Author
Offline
Send a private message to Willowhic
Posts: 102
Thank you received: 0
Well, yesterday started as any usual Monday-back to the grind...but I called a buddy of mine that does a lot of hauling; I mentioned that I was looking for an excavator (larger sized, not mini) and he told me of a Cat 325 that could be had TODAY for ~$6000. It was missing the bucket and the top hydraulic cylinder, had some engine trouble but ran, had a good UC, good turntable, good hyd pump/drive, and he knew where the bucket and upper hyd cyl were! I was nearly thrilled! He said he would call the guy that was supposed to haul it off for scrap THAT DAY and I give him my number. Within 3min I got a call. Turns out he had to move the 325 from it's location that day and we struck a deal-IF he could get it loaded without cutting off the boom-he'd haul it an hour north to our agreed-upon destination where his check would be waiting. Plus, he'd call and let me know about his progress.
So far so good!!

I called the bank, had a cashier's check cut, and waited to hear back from him. When I got another break from work, I called him at about 1pm. "How's it going?" I asked. "I had to cut it up," was his reply. He added, "I got it loaded and grossed out at 133,000# and I can only haul 120,000#; besides the tracks were locked up. It was going to be more trouble than it's worth."
"Oh, I'm very sorry to hear that, but I do appreciate your time and efforts to get it to me; I understand you're in a time crunch but I just really hoped it would've worked out. I guess it just wasn't meant to be," I replied.
"Well, I do come across machines this size now and then and I have your number, so I'll keep you in mind." "That would be great; thanks. And again, I deeply appreciate your time."

So it went yesterday:I made a new contact who seems like a decent sort, but sadly had a fantastic machine slip thru my fingers and succumb to the torch. LORD-willing, another machine opportunity will present that isn't lost to time.

Sorry to relay bad news, but I think too often machines are cut up for scrap that would otherwise serve well-especially for my purposes.

Hat-in-hand,
nate
1988 JCB 1400B backhoe
1966 Cat D9 cable dozer
1966 Cat 980 wheel loader
1967 Galion 140 grader
1963 Cat D7E hydraulic dozer 47A886
196? Cat 112 grader 3U3308 (engine: 3U243)
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Wed, Nov 4, 2015 7:18 AM
d9gdon
Offline
Send a private message to d9gdon
Posts: 870
Thank you received: 0
So now instead of $6000 for the machine, he cuts it up for scrap and gets $60 a ton for a 28 ton machine, unless it's oversize and then much less. That's before expenses.

He's getting rich. Now he just needs a bigger wagon, like the old story.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Wed, Nov 4, 2015 7:40 AM
Willowhic
Topic Author
Offline
Send a private message to Willowhic
Posts: 102
Thank you received: 0
Reply to d9gdon:
So now instead of $6000 for the machine, he cuts it up for scrap and gets $60 a ton for a 28 ton machine, unless it's oversize and then much less. That's before expenses.

He's getting rich. Now he just needs a bigger wagon, like the old story.
Yeah, doesn't make much sense to me-except that time was his main concern. Just sad that a nice machine met such a pointless end.
1988 JCB 1400B backhoe
1966 Cat D9 cable dozer
1966 Cat 980 wheel loader
1967 Galion 140 grader
1963 Cat D7E hydraulic dozer 47A886
196? Cat 112 grader 3U3308 (engine: 3U243)
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Wed, Nov 4, 2015 8:04 AM
Wombat
Offline
Member
Donor
Send a private message to Wombat
Posts: 1,004
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Willowhic:
Yeah, doesn't make much sense to me-except that time was his main concern. Just sad that a nice machine met such a pointless end.
Something doesn't add up too me, Gross 60 ton less 25 for machine, he has 35 for truck and trailer. I think he got a better offer/price elsewhere.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Wed, Nov 4, 2015 8:27 AM
Willowhic
Topic Author
Offline
Send a private message to Willowhic
Posts: 102
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Wombat:
Something doesn't add up too me, Gross 60 ton less 25 for machine, he has 35 for truck and trailer. I think he got a better offer/price elsewhere.
Not much adds up with the whole deal. I have to guess that he had more to haul than just that one 325 excavator-otherwise it says that his truck and trailer alone are OVER 80,000#. Also, having been told by a credible source that the machine ran and drove fine doesn't add up with the tracks being locked-my guess is that they couldn't get it started or didn't try...
I would actually prefer to think that he got a better offer-because at least then the machine would still be viable, instead of a nearly worthless pile of scrap.
Nevertheless, I trust that there's a reason things happened this way that'll work out for good.

Thanks for the objective input and support d9don and wombat; it's nice to be able to share this with others who'd rather see a machine preserved-even if it's not yet in the antique category.
1988 JCB 1400B backhoe
1966 Cat D9 cable dozer
1966 Cat 980 wheel loader
1967 Galion 140 grader
1963 Cat D7E hydraulic dozer 47A886
196? Cat 112 grader 3U3308 (engine: 3U243)
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Thu, Nov 5, 2015 12:01 AM
rturn3060
Offline
Member
Send a private message to rturn3060
Posts: 209
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Willowhic:
Not much adds up with the whole deal. I have to guess that he had more to haul than just that one 325 excavator-otherwise it says that his truck and trailer alone are OVER 80,000#. Also, having been told by a credible source that the machine ran and drove fine doesn't add up with the tracks being locked-my guess is that they couldn't get it started or didn't try...
I would actually prefer to think that he got a better offer-because at least then the machine would still be viable, instead of a nearly worthless pile of scrap.
Nevertheless, I trust that there's a reason things happened this way that'll work out for good.

Thanks for the objective input and support d9don and wombat; it's nice to be able to share this with others who'd rather see a machine preserved-even if it's not yet in the antique category.
The trucker probably did you a favor as a 235 weighs in the neighborhood of 95000 pounds so they cannot be easily moved and if it had already been cannibalized you would be looking at a large expense to get it going again. Look at Machinery Trader Auction results to see what a complete machine goes for world wide.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Thu, Nov 5, 2015 7:30 AM
d9gdon
Offline
Send a private message to d9gdon
Posts: 870
Thank you received: 0
Reply to rturn3060:
The trucker probably did you a favor as a 235 weighs in the neighborhood of 95000 pounds so they cannot be easily moved and if it had already been cannibalized you would be looking at a large expense to get it going again. Look at Machinery Trader Auction results to see what a complete machine goes for world wide.


Russell, I believe you have solved the mystery. There's a big difference between a 235 and the later 325 excavator. I think it's about an additional 35,000 lbs.

That makes a lot more sense.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Thu, Nov 5, 2015 8:38 AM
Willowhic
Topic Author
Offline
Send a private message to Willowhic
Posts: 102
Thank you received: 0
Reply to d9gdon:


Russell, I believe you have solved the mystery. There's a big difference between a 235 and the later 325 excavator. I think it's about an additional 35,000 lbs.

That makes a lot more sense.
Makes more sense as far as weight goes, but $60/ton at 47tons would still be around $2800.00 which is quite a bit less than $6000.00 and doesn't take into account the work/time cutting it up. Plus, I would have MUCH preferred to have a 235 than a 325 anyday 😊
1988 JCB 1400B backhoe
1966 Cat D9 cable dozer
1966 Cat 980 wheel loader
1967 Galion 140 grader
1963 Cat D7E hydraulic dozer 47A886
196? Cat 112 grader 3U3308 (engine: 3U243)
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Thu, Nov 5, 2015 10:28 AM
Willowhic
Topic Author
Offline
Send a private message to Willowhic
Posts: 102
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Willowhic:
Makes more sense as far as weight goes, but $60/ton at 47tons would still be around $2800.00 which is quite a bit less than $6000.00 and doesn't take into account the work/time cutting it up. Plus, I would have MUCH preferred to have a 235 than a 325 anyday 😊
Hi all,
I was curious so I confirmed with my buddy that it was a 235 and not a 325. Not sure where the mixup happened, but I wanted to apologize for the confusion.

I would have been happy with either, but I prefer the larger machines and subsequently was the more disappointed to learn that it was a larger machine that went the way of all the earth.
1988 JCB 1400B backhoe
1966 Cat D9 cable dozer
1966 Cat 980 wheel loader
1967 Galion 140 grader
1963 Cat D7E hydraulic dozer 47A886
196? Cat 112 grader 3U3308 (engine: 3U243)
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Fri, Nov 6, 2015 2:22 AM
Showing 1 to 8 of 8 results
YouTube Video Placeholder

Follow Us on Social Media

Our channel highlights machines from the earliest Holt and Best track-type tractors, equipment from the start of Caterpillar in 1925, up to units built in the mid-1960s.

Upcoming Events

KORUMBURRA WORKING HORSE & TRACTOR & 100 YEARS OF CAT RALLY

Chapter Nineteen

| 5875 STH GIPPSLAND HWY, NYORA

Booleroo 2025

Chapter Thirty

| Booleroo Centre, 54 Arthur St, Booleroo Centre SA 5482, Australia

CAFES 2025 TULARE, CALIFORNIA

Chapter Fifteen

| Tulare, California

Wheatlands Warracknabeal Easter Rally

Chapter Nineteen

| 34 Henty Hwy, Warracknabeal
View Calendar
ACMOC

Antique Caterpillar
Machinery Owners Club

1115 Madison St NE # 1117
Salem, OR 97301

[email protected]

Terms & Privacy
Website developed by AdCo

Testimonials

"I also joined a year ago. had been on here a couple of times as a non-member and found the info very helpful so I got a one year subscription (not very expensive at all) to try it out. I really like all the resources on here so I just got a three year. I think its a very small price for what you can get out of this site."
-Jason N

Join Today!