Reply to drujinin:
My 2 cents on this subject and I am sure there will be those who will want to hang me for speaking my piece. Are we building show machines and play toys or construction/farming machines which are better than what came out of the factory?
Lets consider what these machines are doing.
Zim says 1/2in and hammer, I say heat and 3/4 impact. Well I think Zim knows these machines will be painted up to sit like a show car and never be used. I tightened mine up like a guy out west who uses his machine suggested. Mine is a working machine which hasn't fell apart yet?? If it does then you can say, "Told you so!"
If I had a hydraulic tool to use, then I would do so. But on machines that get less than 50 gallons of fuel put through them in a year. An expensive specailized tool is hard to justify.
My opinion whether you all like it or not,
Jeff
hi jeff, appreciate your input as always,,, i do intend to go out plowing or scrapering or something with both machines... so i want it right...
i am trying to find an alternate method ( as you once said , back in the day the guys had much less tooling available and they made it work, )so is it that big of a deal???? I talked with KCB and told him i kinda hoped someone on the BB would say ......" i did a 22 like this (blah blah blah...) without hydraulic tools and it has held just fine .... " BUT, no one like that chimed in....
Sooooo, i guess i gotta come up with or borrow a porta power 10 ton ram with a hole in the center , to do it right... as KCB mentioned to me it is hard to measure hammer blows, and for that matter hard to measure heat application , and i suppose hard to measure rattle wrench results too...
the only thing i know for sure from reading the BB posts on this subject is that 15 tons might be too much for a 22 .cause you dont want to crack the tapered hubs,,, but you dont want to be to loose and risk them coming loose and wallowing out the keyways and wrecking the shaft.
I thought about just borrowing from work a regular porta power ram , with a pressure guage, and figure out the PSI to give me 10 tons, then making up a piece of like 2" heavy pipe with a plate on it ( for over the lock nut,) then pushing on some kind of fabricated "bridge" that spans between the flanges, fastening it to the final drive flange or trans case,,, but this would put the ten tons or so direct on the roller bearings that support the bevel gear.... would that be acceptable ??? it may be easier, would give me a "measurable and repeatable" press fit, What do you guys think of that???? of course for the brake drum on the final drive i would have to remove the little cover plate and bear directly on the other end of that shaft somehow.
Either way i have to come up with a hyd setup somehow, and i have 4 finals that need the drums installed, plus the 4 cluch packs to do, before i can close up the finals. so i am on hold till i get a definte answer.. I appreciate any and all input! Thank You all... Dave 920-210-2875