ACMOC
Login
ACMOC
differance between d7 3t and d7 4t

differance between d7 3t and d7 4t

Showing 1 to 10 of 37 results
1
sandcreek
Topic Author
Offline
Send a private message to sandcreek
Posts: 56
Thank you received: 0
I am looking at a d7 4t direct electric start cable dozer in decent shape. Serial 4t5576. I have a d7 3t dozer now. Just wondering what was differant about the 4t
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Wed, May 20, 2009 1:05 AM
Old Magnet
Offline
Send a private message to Old Magnet
Posts: 16,695
Thank you received: 17
No difference from what I can tell in the War Department Technical Manual.
Maybe gearing...I didn't compare that.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Wed, May 20, 2009 1:31 AM
SJ
Offline
Send a private message to SJ
Posts: 1,890
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Old Magnet:
No difference from what I can tell in the War Department Technical Manual.
Maybe gearing...I didn't compare that.
OM, the 4T was made for the army weren,t they. We used to get one in once in awhile to work on after the war so the Govt. sold them I guess.I think some of them were assembled here near me at a plant that made tanks too in Berwick Pa.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Wed, May 20, 2009 2:28 AM
Old Magnet
Offline
Send a private message to Old Magnet
Posts: 16,695
Thank you received: 17
Reply to SJ:
OM, the 4T was made for the army weren,t they. We used to get one in once in awhile to work on after the war so the Govt. sold them I guess.I think some of them were assembled here near me at a plant that made tanks too in Berwick Pa.
Yes, SJ...4T was Army version, 6T was Navy.....all the same stuff as far as I know....course now someone will correct me 😊
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Wed, May 20, 2009 2:49 AM
Deas Plant.
Offline
Member
Send a private message to Deas Plant.
Location: Currently - DowNunda.
Posts: 6,657
Thank you received: 18
Reply to Old Magnet:
Yes, SJ...4T was Army version, 6T was Navy.....all the same stuff as far as I know....course now someone will correct me 😊
Hi, Sandcreek and Old Magnet.
In some cases, there was very little if any difference between the 3T and 4T D7's. How-wevver, as I understand it, the U.S. Army did require some of the 4T's to have different gearing from the standard 3T arrangement. I think the same applied to the 6T series that was made for the U.S. Navy and I'd hate to bet that the army and navy collaborated on this and made the variations the same.

You have a wonderful day. Best wishes. Deas Plant.

Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Wed, May 20, 2009 3:18 AM
7upuller
Offline
Deceased
Send a private message to 7upuller
Posts: 3,737
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Deas Plant.:
Hi, Sandcreek and Old Magnet.
In some cases, there was very little if any difference between the 3T and 4T D7's. How-wevver, as I understand it, the U.S. Army did require some of the 4T's to have different gearing from the standard 3T arrangement. I think the same applied to the 6T series that was made for the U.S. Navy and I'd hate to bet that the army and navy collaborated on this and made the variations the same.
Old Magnet,

I think you know your s**t, Yes I think you are correct, so I guess you have been correct-ed😉 -glen
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Wed, May 20, 2009 3:59 AM
OzDozer
Offline
Send a private message to OzDozer
Posts: 1,125
Thank you received: 0
Reply to 7upuller:
Old Magnet,

I think you know your s**t, Yes I think you are correct, so I guess you have been correct-ed😉 -glen
The 4T and 6T tractors were built for specific Army and Navy contract orders .. using the basic 3T tractor .. and adding the specific requirements (which were mostly attachments) listed in those contract orders.

I have never specifically seen one of those orders, but I understand that the biggest change between the 3T, 4T and 6T was in the specific attachments, that were requested to meet the conditions, that the tractors had to perform under. The attachments involved, included winches (front or rear) .. starting, lighting and generating systems .. specific Military attachments such as tie-downs, brackets for military tools and jerrycans .. and possibly, gearing variations.

The 1949 military manual description on the cover, states .. "Tractor, Crawler type, Diesel driven - 17,100 to 22,500 drawbar lbs pull - Standard Caterpillar D7, 74 in gage - Tractor S/No's 7M1-up, 3T1-up and 4T1-up" .. thus indicating that there are no serious changes in specifications between all these tractors.
The variation in drawbar pulls, indicate gearing changes to me. I do not recall any HP variations between these tractors, so gearing is the only possible reason for the variations in drawbar pull.

The manual does not list transmission or final drive specifications, but it lists every other single specification.
Interestingly, the listing under "accessories" shows 3 different generators (Bosch & 2 Delco Remy's) .. a battery, lighting & starting system .. head lamp bulbs .. dash & tail lamp bulbs .. and a starting engine starter .. that are all noted, as "Special Attachments". These areas would be the main areas of difference between the different S/No's.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Wed, May 20, 2009 8:51 AM
sandcreek
Topic Author
Offline
Send a private message to sandcreek
Posts: 56
Thank you received: 0
Reply to OzDozer:
The 4T and 6T tractors were built for specific Army and Navy contract orders .. using the basic 3T tractor .. and adding the specific requirements (which were mostly attachments) listed in those contract orders.

I have never specifically seen one of those orders, but I understand that the biggest change between the 3T, 4T and 6T was in the specific attachments, that were requested to meet the conditions, that the tractors had to perform under. The attachments involved, included winches (front or rear) .. starting, lighting and generating systems .. specific Military attachments such as tie-downs, brackets for military tools and jerrycans .. and possibly, gearing variations.

The 1949 military manual description on the cover, states .. "Tractor, Crawler type, Diesel driven - 17,100 to 22,500 drawbar lbs pull - Standard Caterpillar D7, 74 in gage - Tractor S/No's 7M1-up, 3T1-up and 4T1-up" .. thus indicating that there are no serious changes in specifications between all these tractors.
The variation in drawbar pulls, indicate gearing changes to me. I do not recall any HP variations between these tractors, so gearing is the only possible reason for the variations in drawbar pull.

The manual does not list transmission or final drive specifications, but it lists every other single specification.
Interestingly, the listing under "accessories" shows 3 different generators (Bosch & 2 Delco Remy's) .. a battery, lighting & starting system .. head lamp bulbs .. dash & tail lamp bulbs .. and a starting engine starter .. that are all noted, as "Special Attachments". These areas would be the main areas of difference between the different S/No's.
Thank you for all the information. I can not believe the wealth of knowledge and the friendly help on this board. I think I will buy the old girl. Thanks again.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Wed, May 20, 2009 9:47 AM
Deas Plant.
Offline
Member
Send a private message to Deas Plant.
Location: Currently - DowNunda.
Posts: 6,657
Thank you received: 18
Reply to sandcreek:
Thank you for all the information. I can not believe the wealth of knowledge and the friendly help on this board. I think I will buy the old girl. Thanks again.
Hi, OzDozer.
Thanks for the additional information on the variations. I had heard of the gearing variations but didn't know that all the other bits and pieces were also specified varaitions.

Thanks again.

You have a wonderful day. Best wishes. Deas Plant.

Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Wed, May 20, 2009 1:02 PM
Old 3T lover
Offline
Send a private message to Old 3T lover
Posts: 410
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Deas Plant.:
Hi, OzDozer.
Thanks for the additional information on the variations. I had heard of the gearing variations but didn't know that all the other bits and pieces were also specified varaitions.

Thanks again.
As mentioned, possible gearing differences and a lighter chasis is the biggest difference. The first 2 or 3 thousand 3T's also had the lighter chasis, then they beefed them up some.

If you're thinking of using it for a parts machine, they'll all pretty much work if you watch what you're doing.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Wed, May 20, 2009 6:31 PM
King of Obsolete
Offline
Send a private message to King of Obsolete
Posts: 946
Thank you received: 0
Reply to sandcreek:
Thank you for all the information. I can not believe the wealth of knowledge and the friendly help on this board. I think I will buy the old girl. Thanks again.
i have a 4t which you can see more here on my website.

http://kingofobsolete.ca/caterpillar_d7_4t_KING_OF%20_OBSOLETE_WEBPAGE.htm

the brass rad is making it hard for me to find one up here in the great white north.

thansk
KoO
Published Author
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Wed, May 20, 2009 11:16 PM
Showing 1 to 10 of 37 results
1
YouTube Video Placeholder

Follow Us on Social Media

Our channel highlights machines from the earliest Holt and Best track-type tractors, equipment from the start of Caterpillar in 1925, up to units built in the mid-1960s.

Upcoming Events

Veerkamp Open House 2025

Chapter Fifteen

| Placerville, CA

Lake Goldsmith Steam and Vintage Rally

Chapter Nineteen

| 1234 Carngham-Lake Goldsmith Rd, Lake Goldsmith, Victoria, 3373, Australia

Stradsett Park Vintage Rally

Chapter Two

| Stradsett, Nr Downham Market. Norfolk PE33 9HA UK

Chapter 2 The Link Club's AGM

Chapter Two

| Faulkner Farm, West Drove, Wisbech, Cambridgeshire, PE14 7DP, UK
View Calendar
ACMOC

Antique Caterpillar
Machinery Owners Club

1115 Madison St NE # 1117
Salem, OR 97301

[email protected]

Terms & Privacy
Website developed by AdCo

Testimonials

"I also joined a year ago. had been on here a couple of times as a non-member and found the info very helpful so I got a one year subscription (not very expensive at all) to try it out. I really like all the resources on here so I just got a three year. I think its a very small price for what you can get out of this site."
-Jason N

Join Today!