ACMOC
Login
ACMOC
The effect of lubricant on torque spec

The effect of lubricant on torque spec

Showing 1 to 10 of 15 results
1
TOGNOT
Topic Author
Offline
Send a private message to TOGNOT
Posts: 725
Thank you received: 0
I finally got all my rollers installed on the bottom of my d6 with new CAT bolts and washers ( made in China....)

The torque spec is between 150 and 170 ft lb. I used a moly type assembly lube on the threads. It is my belief that using lubricant on the fastener (bolt) increases the installed stress on the bolt given the same amount of tightening torque.

Example : torque a lubricated bolt to 100 ft lbs. the stress on the bolt is - say - 75,000 psi
Now torque the same bolt with no lube to 100 ft lb. the stress on the bolt is 30,000 psi.

These numbers are just to make my point. And to lead to my question...... Must I consider the lube on my 9/16 NF carrier bolts when calculating a torque spec ? Assuming yes, who can suggest a torque spec based on the above info.?

Thanks - don't want to break a bolt or have one come loose!
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Fri, Nov 3, 2017 4:39 AM
dpendzic
Offline
Send a private message to dpendzic
Posts: 2,763
Thank you received: 1
i really can't speculate on a dozer machinery spec--but i would surmise that it would not be dependent on the lubrication of the threads--every mechanic would be using a different lubricant and amount applied My experience is with structural steel applications--our spec called for a 30000 lb load on a 7/8 diameter A325 bolt. we would take a load cell test each morning and calibrate a torque wrench for the number of foot lbs to achieve this tensile load with no lubricants--the contractor would always use an air impact wrench. I would take my manual torque wrench and calibrate it also, and then would spot check the contractors installations.
As long as you stay below the ultimate tensile strength of the steel bolt and be in the yield strength range it shoudn't matter much where you are--
does this make sense?? OM--your opinion please!
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Fri, Nov 3, 2017 5:03 AM
Old Magnet
Offline
Send a private message to Old Magnet
Posts: 16,695
Thank you received: 17
Reply to dpendzic:
i really can't speculate on a dozer machinery spec--but i would surmise that it would not be dependent on the lubrication of the threads--every mechanic would be using a different lubricant and amount applied My experience is with structural steel applications--our spec called for a 30000 lb load on a 7/8 diameter A325 bolt. we would take a load cell test each morning and calibrate a torque wrench for the number of foot lbs to achieve this tensile load with no lubricants--the contractor would always use an air impact wrench. I would take my manual torque wrench and calibrate it also, and then would spot check the contractors installations.
As long as you stay below the ultimate tensile strength of the steel bolt and be in the yield strength range it shoudn't matter much where you are--
does this make sense?? OM--your opinion please!
Use either one of these charts......
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Fri, Nov 3, 2017 6:19 AM
mog5858
Offline
Member
Send a private message to mog5858
Posts: 1,324
Thank you received: 0
Reply to dpendzic:
i really can't speculate on a dozer machinery spec--but i would surmise that it would not be dependent on the lubrication of the threads--every mechanic would be using a different lubricant and amount applied My experience is with structural steel applications--our spec called for a 30000 lb load on a 7/8 diameter A325 bolt. we would take a load cell test each morning and calibrate a torque wrench for the number of foot lbs to achieve this tensile load with no lubricants--the contractor would always use an air impact wrench. I would take my manual torque wrench and calibrate it also, and then would spot check the contractors installations.
As long as you stay below the ultimate tensile strength of the steel bolt and be in the yield strength range it shoudn't matter much where you are--
does this make sense?? OM--your opinion please!
well what little i know about this is there a 30% difference between lubed and non lubed. so if your looking for 100 ft/lb when lubed it only takes 70 ft/lb to get the same stretch. but this has been when working with BIG stuff 2"-4" range bolts which where most of the time studs in drag lines not bolts. the rule of thumb is it would be a dry torque unless it tell you lubed it. now i know what kind of lube will change things. this is onsite passed down info so consider that when making your decisions as i have never read up myself. i don't know if i answered your question or just made more points to question's .
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Fri, Nov 3, 2017 6:33 AM
dpendzic
Offline
Send a private message to dpendzic
Posts: 2,763
Thank you received: 1
Reply to mog5858:
well what little i know about this is there a 30% difference between lubed and non lubed. so if your looking for 100 ft/lb when lubed it only takes 70 ft/lb to get the same stretch. but this has been when working with BIG stuff 2"-4" range bolts which where most of the time studs in drag lines not bolts. the rule of thumb is it would be a dry torque unless it tell you lubed it. now i know what kind of lube will change things. this is onsite passed down info so consider that when making your decisions as i have never read up myself. i don't know if i answered your question or just made more points to question's .
great tables! surprised at the big differential in the first table between lubricated and ant-seize
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Fri, Nov 3, 2017 6:37 AM
TOGNOT
Topic Author
Offline
Send a private message to TOGNOT
Posts: 725
Thank you received: 0
Reply to dpendzic:
great tables! surprised at the big differential in the first table between lubricated and ant-seize
Thanks all. I torqued them to 100 ft lb ( with lube) . I will run the machine for a few hours ( someday......)
And the have Oilslick crawl under there and recheck them.

Glad I axed that question!
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Fri, Nov 3, 2017 8:04 AM
Old Magnet
Offline
Send a private message to Old Magnet
Posts: 16,695
Thank you received: 17
Reply to TOGNOT:
Thanks all. I torqued them to 100 ft lb ( with lube) . I will run the machine for a few hours ( someday......)
And the have Oilslick crawl under there and recheck them.

Glad I axed that question!
That seems low by either chart using lubed threads.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Fri, Nov 3, 2017 9:03 AM
ETD66SS
Offline
Send a private message to ETD66SS
Posts: 619
Thank you received: 0
Reply to Old Magnet:
That seems low by either chart using lubed threads.
The CAT hardware is made in China???
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Fri, Nov 3, 2017 9:32 AM
Oil Slick
Offline
Send a private message to Oil Slick
Posts: 1,702
Thank you received: 0
Reply to ETD66SS:
The CAT hardware is made in China???
My Cummins manual shows to lubricate all the critical bolts and both sides of the washers.

I’ll look tomorrow and see the torque difference between lubed and dry same size bolts.
Attachment
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Fri, Nov 3, 2017 10:06 AM
ianoz
Offline
Send a private message to ianoz
Posts: 850
Thank you received: 0
Reply to ETD66SS:
The CAT hardware is made in China???


By the looks , not much they don't make in china .
http://www.caterpillar.com/nl/company/global-footprint/apd/china.html
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Fri, Nov 3, 2017 10:12 AM
rmyram
Offline
Send a private message to rmyram
Posts: 598
Thank you received: 0
i would have used nickel antiseize as the lube and dropped the tourque down about 20 % to about 120 to 130. or so.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Fri, Nov 3, 2017 11:55 AM
Showing 1 to 10 of 15 results
1
YouTube Video Placeholder

Follow Us on Social Media

Our channel highlights machines from the earliest Holt and Best track-type tractors, equipment from the start of Caterpillar in 1925, up to units built in the mid-1960s.

Upcoming Events

Veerkamp Open House 2025

Chapter Fifteen

| Placerville, CA

Lake Goldsmith Steam and Vintage Rally

Chapter Nineteen

| 1234 Carngham-Lake Goldsmith Rd, Lake Goldsmith, Victoria, 3373, Australia

Stradsett Park Vintage Rally

Chapter Two

| Stradsett, Nr Downham Market. Norfolk PE33 9HA UK

Chapter 2 The Link Club's AGM

Chapter Two

| Faulkner Farm, West Drove, Wisbech, Cambridgeshire, PE14 7DP, UK
View Calendar
ACMOC

Antique Caterpillar
Machinery Owners Club

1115 Madison St NE # 1117
Salem, OR 97301

[email protected]

Terms & Privacy
Website developed by AdCo

Testimonials

"I also joined a year ago. had been on here a couple of times as a non-member and found the info very helpful so I got a one year subscription (not very expensive at all) to try it out. I really like all the resources on here so I just got a three year. I think its a very small price for what you can get out of this site."
-Jason N

Join Today!