I have been watching this thread also and I agree it has gotten a bit out of line. I'm going to run down the posts from the beginning here and provide a bit of commentary or observation about them.
We all have to keep in mind that written words often come across differently in tone and inflection to the reader than they were intended to by the writer. We do all need to give each other the benefit of the doubt. Having said that, here is what I think about the above exchanges:
Post 1 - 22rimfire - I feel your first post was reasonable, you give a nice description of your tractor and provided a photo and asked opinions about value.
Post 2 - lady cat skinner - I feel your post was respectful, responsive, you indicate where you are and that you are interested in buying 22rimfire's tractor, even explaining a bit about why. You provide an offer. That offer is, I'm sure, indicative of your thoughts on value with the information you have at hand, which is exactly what 22rimfire was asking for.
Post 3 - 22rimfire - your reply is a bit terse, to me, and is just a bit out of line. As some of the others have indicated, I would question whether a scrapyard would pay $3,000 for a 22,000 pound tractor. Some on here would probably consider your comment about the scrapyard a bit inflammatory. We are, after all, a tractor and history preservation website. You may not have thought about that, though, when composing your reply.
Post 4 - monserandsons - Your reply is a little short too, so is a little more at risk of people reading meaning into it. Because I recognize you and have followed your posts on here for some time, I know that you, like me, are probably calling into question 22rimfire's assessment of the scrap value of the tractor. Here in the Bakersfield, California area, the last load of scrap we sent earlier this week paid $21.00 per ton (2,000 pounds) for clean, sorted and sized good steel. At a likely 22,000 pounds, or 11 tons, 22rimfire's D6 9U would have net $231.00 last week, had my crew bothered to clean it, cut it into four foot minus chunks and hauled it in. Of course, we would have had the additional cost of that preparation, of disposing of all the oil and fluids, the rubber hoses, belts and other stuff, and the freight to get it all to the yard, so we would have actually lost money on the deal.
At this point, I kind of had the feeling that 22rimfire was a little insulted by lady cat skinner's offer and came back with a response which was calculated to be similarly insulting or stinging. It might have been a little more constructive for 22rimfire to have recognized that lady cat skinner was simply responding to his request for feedback. He didn't, after all, provide any parameters or indication of his thoughts. Still, I wouldn't have said that 22rimfire's reply was too out of line. Likewise, while monserandsons reply was short and to the point, he clearly was trying to provide some independent feedback on the $1,500 offered by lady cat skinner and the $3,000 posited by 22rimfire.
Post 5 - jlahun - Your reply is more detailed and more helpful in explaining why you think 22rimfire's reply is a bit out of line. It does read to me probably a little more strongly than you may have meant. I do agree with your perspective, however, that in the first exchange, the appearance is that 22rimfire asked a reasonable question, lady cat skinner gave a reasonable response from her perspective, and 22rimfire's first reply was beginning to get a little unconstructive.
Post 6 - d9gdon - Your reply is helpful in reinforcing that 22rimfire's assessment of scrap value seems outside of our current experience. It is nice too, in that it doesn't go any further. You apparently feel that simply stating your perspective should be enough and people can take it for what it is.
Post 7 - 22rimfire - This post pretty much exceeds the guidelines for decorum here on this forum. We try to maintain a family friendly, constructive and helpful environment. I can relate to the fact that lady cat skinner's reply was probably well outside of your expectations and probably disappointing. No doubt the follow-up comments from others were also disappointing. I do appreciate that you kept your comments family friendly. Most of what you said, however was pretty inflammatory and just a bit insulting.
I am glad that you reinforced that you would not scrap it, your second reply had me wondering if that was an honest option for you. Saying that $1,500 is low for a running piece of machinery, even for a lawn mower, is really not necessary. It is also not factually correct. Within the last two years, I personally have purchased a D6 9U very similar to yours for $400.00 at an auction, a very nice D8 14A with straight blade for $1,750.00 at another auction, a complete, running and working DW-21 from a private party for $1,900.00, a running and working D4 2T with near new undercarriage, hydraulic angle blade and FOPS for $400.00, and that is only part of the list. This doesn't mean that you should consider selling your tractor for low prices like that. I'm just pointing out that it is not unreasonable for someone to offer $1,500.00 as a starting bid for a tractor about which they have four phrases of description and a single, small photo.
The rest of this post is really just a dismissal of all of us no this forum. That is also unnecessary. If you don't agree with the opinions posted here, don't read them. Remember that this thread started with your open request for information. It isn't fair to resent the answers you were provided.
Post 8 - jlahun - Your passion clearly comes through. Your message though, is spot on. Essentially saying what I reiterated above.
Post 9 - Deas Plant - You confirm jlahun's and others perspective that 22rimfire is just a bit out of line. A helpful and constructive reply.
Post 10 - cheshire cat - An even more helpful reply, pointing out how 22rimfire and any future readers might ensure that their solicitation results in replies closer to their expectations.
Post 11 - mrsmackpaul - You are generally very helpful and constructive on this forum, and here I see you continuing to try to help us all get past our emotional reading and back on track. Even though I see that 22rimfire's answer in post 3 as the first that began to stray, we seem, to have had several who jumped in and he might take this as a flaming or feeding frenzy. I think a little balance here, so that he can see that there are some who see his side of things should be helpful and constructive.
Post 12 - ronm - Had 22rimfire set some expectation or guideline in his first post at $3,000 or thereabouts, I might agree with you. He just posted a short description, a single small photo and asked what anyone thought it was worth. lady cat skinner was the first to reply with what I'm sure she felt was a reasonable offer. If I remember correctly, I think that is about the ballpark she paid for the two D6s she already owns. I don't see how 22rimfire had any cause to be insulted by her offer, although his reply made me think he was insulted. Even if he was insulted, however, it would have been more constructive to come back with a reasoned explanation about why he didn't think her assessment was a good one. I don't know the scrap market in his area, but I would be absolutely shocked if an unprepared, complete and dirty D6 9U could be sold for scrap anywhere in North America during this month for even half of his $3,000.
My opinion on that value leaves me no alternative perspective on 22rimfire's reply other than he was trying to be insulting himself.
22rimfire and the others who have posted here. I hope you all take this as it is intended: A mild rebuke and a request to re-read and give the writer the benefit of the doubt. This thread has gotten off track just a bit, but we need to get it back on track, keep things positive, supportive and constructive. Life is too short to let others get under our skin, or spend time trying to get under theirs.
Pete.