acmoc

ACMOC Membership Benefits

  • FREE quarterly magazine filled with content about antique Caterpillar machines
  • FREE classified listings
  • ACMOC store discounts and specials
  • Full Bulletin Board Access
    • Marketplace (For Sale/Wanted)
    • Technical Library
    • Post attachments

$44 /year ELECTRONIC

$60 /year USA

$77 /year International

Mechanical Aptitude Test

More
17 years 4 weeks ago #10547 by §wishy
C how U fare

clikn here will getcha there
www.forddoctorsdts.com/quizzes/MechanicalAptitude.php


Jist read the 1st page n clik START

cya
§wishy
HasBeen

:rolleyes: - : ButEyeDoSt&2BCorrected : - :p
Ifn U Get my Drift
:eek:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 years 4 weeks ago #10557 by Ron Gordon
Replied by Ron Gordon on topic Mechanical Aptitude Test
I took that test on another site,got an 82 on it.Humiliating.I got the electrical part just fine,the pulleys can get to ya,one of them I ended up guessing at.LOL
Some of the questions are not phrased properly and can get you in trouble and some have multiple answers so be sure and read them ALL before you select the proper one.It was an eye opener for me and I guess I needed it.:)
There were several replies on the forum where I found it and nobody aced it but there were a few in the 90s.I bet if I took it again..............Ron G:D :D

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 years 4 weeks ago #10561 by Jon
Replied by Jon on topic Mechanical Aptitude Test
I got 90, should have done better.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 years 4 weeks ago #10567 by Jack
Replied by Jack on topic Mechanical Aptitude Test
Not meaning to brag, but I got 98 on the test. What concerns me: Does this mean that I'm a Ford tractor man rather than a Cat man? Scary.:eek:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 years 4 weeks ago #10568 by pasochris
Replied by pasochris on topic Mechanical Aptitude Test
That was a fun test, I got a 92. Several of those questions are somewhat incomplete and ambiguous and could have multiple correct answers in my opinion depending on how one fills in the missing details.

Chris Clarke

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • ktmrider
  • ktmrider's Avatar
  • Visitor
  • User
17 years 3 weeks ago #10600 by ktmrider
Replied by ktmrider on topic Mechanical Aptitude Test

That was a fun test, I got a 92. Several of those questions are somewhat incomplete and ambiguous and could have multiple correct answers in my opinion depending on how one fills in the missing details.



My thoughts exactly. 92 here by the way.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 years 3 weeks ago #10610 by ETD66SS
Replied by ETD66SS on topic Mechanical Aptitude Test
I got 86%

I guess I gave up kinda quick on some of the block & tackle questions...

I did this at work, so blew through it pretty fast...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 years 3 weeks ago #10635 by daron
Replied by daron on topic Mechanical Aptitude Test
Got 90%. Like to know which I missed.

Daron

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 years 3 weeks ago #10637 by Ron Gordon
Replied by Ron Gordon on topic Mechanical Aptitude Test
I was under pressure to do something else and could not give it the concentration it deserved but the phrasing of the questions gave me my biggest percentage of mistakes.If you click on one of the icons at the top of the page you can review each question and answer.That pulley question with the multiple reductions was the one I guessed at and since it didn't say what size the pulleys were there was no way to accurate calculate the ratio without making some assumptions.I missed 9 questions.......rather correct answers.Ron G:o

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 years 3 weeks ago #10658 by pasochris
Replied by pasochris on topic Mechanical Aptitude Test
Ron,

If your talking about the same pulley question I am thinking of, 3 pulleys on top and 2 on the bottom, the pulley diameter doesn't actually matter. The trick to it is that the tension in the rope is uniform and therefore must be equal to the force exerted by the hand in the drawing. The pulleys only change the direction of the tension force, not its magnitude. If you draw a horizontal line across the middle of the picture and "cut off" the top half of the system then 5 rope leads remain that support the weight. Because the tension is uniform throughout the rope, the total force applied to the weight is 5 times the force applied by the hand. The price paid for this mechanical advantage is that to lift the weight a given distance, the rope must be pulled 5 times that distance.

I always loved problems like that...

Chris Clarke

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.179 seconds
Go to top